User talk:Thegermans

March 2014
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Bolton Wanderers F.C. without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Mattythewhite (talk) 20:41, 4 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Please stop changing the location of the Metropolitan Borough of Bolton and Bolton Wanderers F.C. articles to Lancashire from their correct location of Greater Manchester. Your persistent reverting of other editors corrections to your Vandalism will only result in your editing access being blocked. Richard Harvey (talk)
 * Mr Harvey, 1) I am NOT a vandal. Do you know what the word means? If you did you would not have called me such an offensive name. 2) as I Boltonian I think I know where Bolton is. It is in Lancashire as ANYONE who was born there will tell you. 3) Who made you the thought police? Regards Adrian J German, Boltonian, Lancastrian, Englishman, Briton — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thegermans (talk • contribs) 6:54 pm, Today (UTC+0)


 * I am quite aware of what the word means. In the context of Wikipedia it is a word that applies to people who incorrectly persists in replacing correct data in articles with incorrect detail and then continually revert corrections to their editing by other editors. Your persistence in changing the Geographic location of the Metropolitan Borough of Bolton and Bolton Wanderers F.C. to Lancashire from their correct location of Greater Manchester constitutes Vandalism. Bolton has not been a part of Lancashire since 1974. Your incivility in your message above is also not welcome on the project. Richard Harvey (talk) 10:13 pm, Today (UTC+0)

YOU HAVE THE CHEEK TO TALK ABOUT MY BEING UNCIVIL WHEN YOU HAVE A) REFRRED TO ME AS A VANDAL - WHICH I AM NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! JUST BECAUSE I AM AUTISTIC IS NO REASON TO BE RUDE TO ME B) YOU ARE NOT A BOLTONIAN SO KNOW NOTHING ABOUT BOLTON SO STOP MEDDLING IN THINGS YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT C) IF I HAD SAID WHAT I REALLY THOUGTH ABOUT YOU, WELL, ........ - BASICALLY YOU ARE A VERY RUDE MAN.


 * I have moved the unsigned message you left on my talk page, shown above, here, for continuity.. Please note that I am not psychic and there unaware of your Autism. However that does not excuse your persistence in reverting multiple editors reversions of your editing to change the geographic locations of articles from its correct location in one county to another, that it is no longer a part of. Richard Harvey (talk) 10:48, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

actually it explains it perfectly.

firstly, I take great exception to anyone remotely being rude to me such as calling me a vandal

secondly, My approach to life is probably best summed up with "I may have my faults but being wrong is not one of them". So when I know I'm right, I know I'm right and no one (in a recent example, 4 men with machine guns could not dissuade me) can deflect me.

I think what we have here is like the story of the 2 knights who meet at a crossroads where a statue of a knight is situated. The first knight says the statue's shield is gold. the other knight, who had approached from the opposite direction said "no, it's bronze", where upon the fought and both fell mortally wounded by the other's lance

You are correct in that Bolton is a town who is governed by the metropolitan county of G Manchester I am correct in that Bolton is a town situated in the geographical (and ceremonial) county of Lancashire

If you were from Bolton you would abhor the term "Gretaer Manchester" (intentional mis-typing) as there is such a hatred in Bolton of things associated with Manchester United (a long history I won't bore you with)

I will revert the changes to my correct as the location of Bolton is more important in this context than who governs it

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thegermans (talk • contribs) 19:57, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Once again I have moved your reply to your own talk page for continuity. I won't bother to reply to it as clearly you have no interest in the guidelines of Wikipedia and are only grandstanding on a SOAPBOX for your own aims. Richard Harvey (talk) 00:12, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. only (talk) 11:40, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mkdw talk 23:57, 16 March 2014 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 21:23, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

How, pray, is this any different from what has happened in totalitarian countries? Who made you the thought police? What gives you the right to interfere in something a) which you know nothing about b) does not concern you c) you have not taken part in and so do not appreciate that I consider this to be bully on your part and therefore a criminal offence? You DO NOT TREAT AUTISTIC PEOPLE THIS WAY - IT IS BULLYING AND MUST STOP NOW

Send me an email address and I will email you if you like, as this is not a tool equipped for the job — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thegermans (talk • contribs)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring and disruptive editing as you are making repeated unsourced changes and making accusations against other editors which you have been continuing to do after your previous blocks. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:19, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user= autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.