User talk:Thegoodson

Hi goodson, I just wanted to know where I can find the reference for blue eye colour in various countries? The only one I found was for Iceland.

March 2008 edition of the WikiProject Germany newsletter
This newsletter is delivered by a bot to all members of WikiProject Germany. If you do not want to receive this newsletter in the future, please leave a note at the talk page of the Outreach department so we can come up with a better spamlist solution. Thank you, -  Newsletter Bot ' Talk  15:43, 23 March 2008 (UTC)''

Temazepam
Hi, there has been a lot of new activity on the temazepam talk page. I believe that you have been the main contributer to the temazepam article. It may be useful if you join the conversation. There is an anon user from some residential old person's nursing home following me around and making huge deletions all over benzo articles. It is out of control. Admins are doing very little. The admins reckon that the solution is to "mediate" and fill up all the talk page after talk page with psychotic drivel. How do you mediate with someone who is in a psychosis is what I would like to know? If you read all of the temazepam page you will see what I mean by psychotic. Anyway the anon nursing home resident is demanding that the temazepam is gutted to suit their psychotic delusions. Just thought that you may want to know. The article does need to be pruned down a little bit though to be honest in some sections.--Literaturegeek (talk) 08:28, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

The anon user troll is back
The anon user is back on the temazepam talk page! He wrote a big reply to you. It hasn't been just the temazepam talk page this anon user has been acting like this on. They have been on the chlordiazepoxide talk page, and the nitrazepam talk page and clobazam and diazepam talk pages causing enormous drama and causing huge damage to the article's content, especially nitrazepam. The nitrazepam article is completely locked to editing. I replied to you on my User_talk:Literaturegeek about the temazepam article. The admins are driving me crazy. They just skim over what the anon user has been writing. They aren't doing their job effectively and we are being tortured now. I don't think the admins realise that this user is a troll because like I say they ain't doing their job and tracking this issue, just skimming the posts. I had to argue and argue on these talk pages trying to stop the articles from getting destroyed by this anon user troll and it was only my opinion versus hers. I used citations and this anon user just trolls over and over the same POV with no citations and demands articles are gutted. Thank God I am not the only one having a problem with this troll.--Literaturegeek (talk) 12:25, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Benzodiazepine agonists carcinogenic in humans
Hi, remember the anon user challenged the animal data? It stimulated me to try and verify if the same toxicities occur in humans. There seems to be a wealth of information on the toxicities in humans similar to animal studies. You may like to read the Toxicity section of the nitrazepam article. I expanded it. Nitrazepam There is a lot of very interesting cited data there now. Found a peer reviewed 2008 article where the reviewer of FDA data says that patients and doctors should be warned that benzos and benzo like drugs cause infection, cancer and death.-- Literature geek |  T@1k?  06:58, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Page unprotection?
Hi there, I've raised the possibility of unprotecting the tamazepam page here. What are your thoughts? Tim Vickers (talk) 17:05, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

70.137
Check it out Talk:Edinburgh. The anon using people's nationality yet again to get their way on benzo articles. They have used the carnage of world war 2 holocaust and nazi slurs against me in the past as you and I know to win their ways. They make me sick.-- Literature geek |  T@1k?  22:51, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

The Ashton Manual in german
This might interest you. The Ashton Manual in german. Might be worth referencing in wiukipedia germany if you edit there.-- Literature geek |  T@1k?  21:38, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Trine.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Trine.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:07, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Affinity.gif missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Affinity.gif is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:52, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring&#32; after a review of the reverts you have made on Swedes. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively. Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dougweller (talk) 20:24, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have been blocked
I see that, true to your username, you have returned (pun intended). Welcome back. You have not, however, made any attempt to explain your long history of misrepresentation and misinformation. You have made no attempt to explain your apparent use of alternate accounts and anonymous edits while away. Instead, you immediately went back to your previous pattern of editing and became involved in another controversy.

Three years of disruptive editing is three years too many. I am blocking this account indefinitely pending an explanation of your behavior on the benzodiazepine articles and your probable use of multiple accounts. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 12:35, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Fvasconcellos, why am I being blocked? I don't care about the benzodiazepine articles anymore and have moved on to articles of subjects I know more about. I tried to make some of the benzodiazepine articles more accurate. I truly thought that temazepam was a Schedule III under the Convention on Psychotropic Substances, but it turns out I was wrong after checking the official site. I had a "toxicity" section on temazepam which stated that temazepam was the most toxic of all benzodiazepines based on a 1993 British study which you can see here in the British Medical Journal (BMJ). I had referenced it. I also had studies from Australia and Ireland which corroborated the 1993 British study and referenced those aswell. But that anonymous user 70.XXX... kept deleting the edits, despite the fact that they were sourced. The same thing happened when I made edits to temazepam's history and it's use by the KGB which I referenced with a book titled "Soviet Psychiatric Abuse: The Shadow over World Psychiatry" and yet still the same person (70.xxx) took it all down, which I never understood why. Literaturegeek and I had been working on the benzodiazepine articles together for a while before user 70.xxx came along and began to ruin things. As far as I'm concerned, he/she is the disruptive editor. That person had followed me where ever I went on wikipedia and reverted my edits, whether they were referenced or not. Also, I don't have a second account, but I have edited articles while not logged on. I had done that on many occasions, I admit. But honestly, I no longer care about the benzodiazepine articles - I tried to improve temazepam from what it originally was and everything I ever did was reverted, even the sourced/referenced edits. Literaturegeek and I worked on the nitrazepam article before 70.xxx came along and it is today a great article, same with lorazepam and clonazepam. Temazepam is one of the older and original benzodiazepines (Chlordiazepoxide was first in 1957, followed by diazepam 1959, oxazepam 1961, nitrazepam 1962, temazepam 1964, and then nimetazepam 1964), so I thought it deserved a good and very informative article, but user 70.xxx just wouldn't allow it to happen. I admit it wasn't the best and some of the sources/references were mixed up and what not, but Literaturegeek and I were working on it just as we did with nitrazepam, lorazepam, clonazepam, and others. I did a lot of work on morphine, hydromorphone, and diamorphine also. But honestly, I no longer care about the benzodiazepine articles and have moved on to editing subjects I know more about (history, World War II, European ethnic groups, etc). I was discussing issues on the Swedes and Heinrich Himmler in their respective talk pages, so can you please unblock me so I can continue on with the discussions? TheGoodSon 20:51, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Affinity.gif listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Affinity.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 17:29, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Trines.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Trines.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)