User talk:Thegurukl83

Welcome!

Hello, Thegurukl83, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 16:00, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

About your edits to the Susan Lim article
Greetings! I see you deleted a section of text from the Susan Lim article. I have restored it, although I have removed some of the claims in the article. Please note that as the major print newspaper of Singapore, the Straits Times is considered a reliable source. —C.Fred (talk) 16:00, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Susan Lim. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 18:04, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Susan Lim appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. As an encyclopedia, we need to report accurately and neutrally what the independent reliable sources say - we cannot comment ourselves on whether what the sources say is appropriate or fair, or add in our own opinions. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 13:04, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Replied to your message
Just to let you know, I've replied to your message here on my talkpage. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 17:37, 3 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Having looked into this a bit further, this is a tricky one. Some of the material you want to add, is derived from what I presume is a reliable source (the singaporelawwatch link). However, I don't think we can realistically keep your version of the article, as it is clearly non-neutral. As a compromise (which may or may not be acceptable to other editors...), what do you think of this old version, which is how the article looked after the last time it was referred to the Biographies of Living Persons Noticeboard? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 17:48, 3 April 2011 (UTC)