User talk:Theguy0000

Cwbb
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A bulletin board that hasn't been released in to the public domain cannot be notable by the guidelines set out in WP:SOFTWARE or WP:WEB.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)  16:45, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:APC logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:APC logo.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 23:06, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Campus Middle School
The article is not being deleted, it is being redirected. There is a difference - deletion includes removing all history of the article, while redirect maintains its history and previous edits. I redirected it, as I have already explained to its original creator, because it does not meet the criteria in Schools (click to go there) regarding notability. School articles, like any other articles, do not get carte blanche entry into Wikipedia - as with all articles, there must be some verifiable assertion of notability. Otherwise the standard operating procedure is that they are redirected to their parent board. Hope this answers your question. Denni  talk 02:44, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * When an article is redirected, there is no way of editing it within Wikipedia unless the article is recreated as a non-redirect. However, you can edit to your heart's content outside of Wikipedia, using any editor which supports plain text (which is about all of them). When the article is complete to your satisfaction, navigate back to the redirect page, click "edit this page" and substitute the redirect text for your own. A word of caution, though - if the article does nothing to assert the notability of its subject, another redirection or even a deletion is possible, if not likely. Denni  talk 23:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Hello?
1: Who are you? (Tell me later) 2: How do you know my name? 3: I deleted the part about me because I found more research. The Blue Ribbon Award is the highest honor, so we don't need to worry. 4: You shouldn't put parentheses in an articles(talk pages are fine, though). Either the information is important enough to stand alone, or it belongs somewhere else. The part about (right next door) is not good. 5: Don't list all the options. We are not advertising CMS. We are only giving info on it. That means take out the "Examples: Canada, blablabla" and the "Electives like:blablabla." You just don't do that. You list one or two, and then you say, "And there are more." 6: Never put "??? Pending ???" or that comment about me on there. It just doesn't work. It doesn't look professional. 7: If you put my name or anyone else's name(I finally can take mine off) on there, there is a chance that the article will be deleted. 8: Try to confirm all information about the stuff you put up. 9: Who are you, really? 10: If you are taking information via schedule courses and other direct resources from the school that YOU translate, I suggest you refrain from putting info up. Do more research. Find more recognition type things. 11: Every time you go on, if you really want to keep the CMS article, I suggest you copy the inner workings. 12: The school colors are white/gray and blue.

That is pretty much all I have to say. -Cheers! --Heero Kirashami 04:17, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

P.S. Denni is an experienced user. If he hadn't warned us, the CMS article would have been deleted.

CMS
Check schools for details of what the article needs. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Heero Kirashami (talk • contribs) 04:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC).

Welcome
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Geniac 16:23, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

When I expand on an article...
I just expanded on a "stub"-rated article. I don't think the article is a stub anymore, but I'm not sure what it should be rated. Should I change the rating myself, or just wait for someone to come along and do it? I have no clue what the usual protocol is for something like this.

The article is JWH-073 if anyone cares.

Thanks! Theguy0000 (talk) 03:23, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * You can do it. Just don't change it to "GA" or "FA", these require special reviews by others. And remove the stub note at the bottom of the article, too.  — fetch ·  comms   03:28, 5 August 2010 (UTC)