User talk:TheguywiththePorsche911/T’s History of LGBTQ+ Communication Studies and History of Queer Communication Studies/Bibliography

B's Peer Review for Class
T used the required number of articles needed for the assignment. Unfortunately, out of the six required sources, I only saw that T had two sources with DOI numbers available, thus they cited properly in the bibliography's reference section. The rest of T’s sources did not have noticeable DOT numbers.

As for where the articles came from, I was not able to tell fully if these articles came from communication journals as I was either not able to have access to the article or the proper DOI was missing. On a positive note, all 6 of T’s sources are over 10 pages long, and it seems most were written before 2000. There was one written after 2000 though. I unfortunately was not able to have access to “Queer Theory”, I am going to guess that the article talks about history.

Moving onto to the next section. According to the review list, it seems T is covering topics from History of LGBTQ+ Communication and History of Queer Communication. Judging by how T wrote out their descriptions of the articles, I can see T plans to focus on the history of LGBTQ/Queer communication through the view of politics. I feel like these two topics and all the articles will work lovely in the bigger section due to displaying how society got to where it is today with communication. From what I can see, it seems T has plenty of sources to discuss this topic properly on Wikipedia with no issues. What I would suggest is finding the DOI’s for the articles that are missing them. This would be a big help in seeing where the articles came from and helping properly cite them. (BeckAugust (talk) 00:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey b, thanks for the feedback, I will go ahead and try to add/find the DOI numbers for the articles that don't have it. I also have to work on citing properly so I will continue to work on it. I also was told to change the majority of my sources since they aren't communication sources so be on the lookout for my revisions! TheguywiththePorsche911 (talk) 17:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Dr. E's Review
T, good source descriptions. as B notes, DOIs are needing when they can be found. I know some historic sources won’t have them, but some will. Most of the sources are not COMM. They are good sources (just not for this Communication Studies page). Please see Canvas for more feedback and respond to this feedback on Wiki during our workshop time. OsaRosa (talk) 07:17, 16 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi Dr. E, after meeting with you in class, I now understand where I went wrong when finding my sources to use for the wiki page. We are also going to meet via zoom tomorrow, so I will try my best to find sources within the communication field of study. I also won't forget to put the DOI for all my sources. TheguywiththePorsche911 (talk) 02:07, 17 April 2024 (UTC)