User talk:Thehotone1970

Image tagging for File:Glider Fastback 100.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Glider Fastback 100.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:31, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Raleigh Chopper article
Please stop inserting unsourced and unencyclopedic content into the article. The current paragraph on design is confirmed by an article in the DailyMail. If you have different reliable sources that can be cited, please provide them. In the meantime, statements such as: have no place in an encyclopedia article. Please read wp:rs and wp:tone for details. -AndrewDressel (talk) 18:27, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * "The Raleigh Chopper's design is always a myth"
 * "Although these two were the guys in charge of their teams"
 * "I worked at Raleigh during this period"


 * I am a long term raleigh chopper enthusiast, you can't believe the media as their information is false. -Thehotone1970 (talk) 18 November 2016


 * Both of those assertions may be true, but that is irrelevant here. The rules on Wikipedia are very clear: every claim must be able to be confirmed by a reliable source, and the DailyMail meets the criteria for a reliable source. As I stated above, if you wish to refute supported claims in the article, you must provide sources of equal or better quality to support you. -AndrewDressel (talk) 22:26, 18 November 2016 (UTC)


 * FAO wiki admins, please stop deleting decent revisions to this article -Thehotone1970 (talk) 06:17, 19 November 2016‎ (UTC)


 * I have remove unsourced claims that contradict existing sourced assertions. Continuing to do so [put them back in] is considered disruptive editing. -AndrewDressel (talk) 12:28, 19 November 2016‎ (UTC)


 * This is not distributive editing, I know what I am taking about, Raleigh choppers are my speciality, and I just want what's best! -Thehotone1970 (talk) 20:35, 19 November 2016‎ (UTC)


 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Please stop inserting unsourced and unencyclopedic content into the article. It is exactly disruptive editing after you have been warned not to do it and told why. Besides being ungrammatical, your claims about the design of the Raleigh Chopper are contradicted by a reliable source. As I have stated before: the rules on Wikipedia are very clear: every claim must able to be confirmed by a reliable source. If you wish to refute supported claims in the article, you must provide sources of equal or better quality to support you. If you continue to ignore these rules, you will eventually get yourself blocked from editing on Wikipedia. -AndrewDressel (talk) 14:10, 19 November 2016 (UTC)