User talk:Theindigenousanarchist

Citation Ethics
Using racist texts as citations is not only ethically problematic but alters our view of history to favor the colonizer, enslaver and oppressor. For example: one cannot write about Native issues from the context of the Colonizer's viewpoint. One must also consider the viewpoint, research and history of Native people. It is tiring to see people add in Wiki sections that include racist information as factual and citing it with well-known racist scientists, racist politicians and etc. Be better than that. This is not factual. This is a political ploy to have you write the victim as deserving or write out the brilliance of the oppressed. Those who perpetuate this falsehood because it is easier, or because it fits their already perceived notions, are sitting well within bigotry. Theindigenousanarchist (talk) 07:15, 11 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Theindigenousanarchist! The standard for Wikipedia sources can be found on the page Reliable sources. I did not see any sources in the content that you removed that did not comply with these standards. What specific sources do you feel are not reliable and why? Thanks! Wikipedialuva (talk) 07:25, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Slavery in Canada
Hi Theindigenousanarchist! I noticed in the article "Slavery in Canada", you removed the entire section "Under Indigenous rule" with the edit summary of "racist content". I read the content that was removed and did not find any obvious racism and the majority of the content was referenced using reliable sources. I restored the content with the exception of what was not referenced. If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know on my talkpage or start a discussion on the article talkpage and tag me. Thanks! Wikipedialuva (talk) 07:20, 11 March 2023 (UTC)