User talk:Theinstantmatrix/Archives/2017/October

Not a big deal, but
I would advise against such edits - those warning are not old enough for removal, in my opinion. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 23:51, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Rollback
Hello. Please, use rollback to revert obvious vandalism, and not things that appear offensive to you. I believe you have made a mistake, when reverting content on my talk, but this content is not a personal attack. I totally understand, that we all make mistakes, but please do not repeat the same mistake twice. Thank you. Cheers, Friy Man  Per aspera ad astra  15:55, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If I can see you being in charge for mistake, I will sadly report your mistakes to an admin, to take your privileges back. I would also advise you to go through WP:CVUA to help you understand what vandalism is and how to fight it. Thank you. Cheers, Friy Man  Per aspera ad astra  15:57, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

School Computer
The edit that was performed at the computer hardware page was a school computer, not an individual laptop (as in, I'm a student, but someone else, probably also a student, made those edits). Anyway, yeah I just wanted you to know that.

Anyway, if you send a reply to this computer, that probably also won't be received by me. Or him. So you probably shouldn't. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.185.18.234 (talk) 17:27, October 17, 2017‎ (UTC)

My addition
I'm sorry but there was a mistake on my fix to the Liam Hackett page. I fixed it however you told me that I didn't if you could check this out and help me put the right info on that would be great Hackett03 (talk) 01:11, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Unnamed section added by Shuja Uddin Mughal
No i have not question when i search about charun oweer and reading about charun oweer and i have not see this information that's why i edited the charun oweer page..! Shuja Uddin Mughal (talk) 23:37, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I did not make a mistake. Please change it back immediately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.161.154.233 (talk) 04:20, October 29, 2017‎ (UTC)
 * The edit you've made to Charun-Oweer, although not vandalism, has multiple problems: it is not supported by citations at all, it violates the Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy especially with the last phrase, "All charun o oweeri peoples are very honest and living with love to each other help to each other and charun o oweeri peoples have the unity to do every work with unity and respect of each other's..", and is possibly original research. To answer your question: No, due to the mentioned problems that are associated with the edit. theinstantmatrix (talk) 04:34, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting vandalism
Hi, thanks for reverting the 'potato' edit on the hidden camera page. I wasn't sure what to do, I just undid the edit by the vandal, but then realized that the 'potato' part was still there. But anyway, thanks! AllyGebies (talk) 00:40, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi! Sorry for the totally late response, but you're welcome! You might want to use a gadget called Twinkle to make reverting vandalism much faster; I've used this nowadays to revert edits where an edit summary may be needed and to use the [ restore this version ] button on any revisions that are not the latest (that's what I actually use when correcting your revert). Twinkle can be enabled right from your preferences, under Gadgets. You may also want to take at look at the Cleaning up vandalism page and Vandalism; these cover what edits may constitute vandalism and how to deal with them. Thanks! theinstantmatrix (talk) 05:03, 29 October 2017 (UTC)