User talk:Thejerm/Archive 2

Nursing schools categorization
There are two reasons why university articles should not be categorized according to their constituent units: an ontological one, in that (for instance) Emory University is neither a law school nor a divinity school, but a university. Emory University School of Law is a law school and categorized as such; the Candler School is a divinity school and categorized as such. The second reason is practical: if every university article were categorized for every program on offer, the article would be cluttered with category links and the category itself would be useless. There are fifty undergraduate programs alone in just one college at my alma mater, which has 14 colleges. In the specific case of nursing schools, most of the state categories were created by a highly zealous editor, since banned for unrelated reasons, and could probably all be collapsed into Category:Nursing schools in the United States. Compare that branch to almost any in Category:Universities and colleges by type and you'll find it to be an anomaly.-choster 17:00, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Actual deletion of categories would of course be brought to CfD. It has just been a very slow cleanup till now :-).-choster

Kennesaw State University (off topic)
I'm a wikipedian from Norway, and I study Røed (talk · no) 23:05, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I highly recommend Kennesaw State. KSU has a strong international presence and department of Polical Science and International Affairs is very good.  Many graduates have gone on to work for local and national political candidates.  Email me if you want to know more.  --Jerm  (Talk/ Contrib) 16:57, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

uh yeah.
Thats sweet, giving me the warning and all, but how is using the commonly accepted name for an event "NPOV"? Thank you for your very valuable time, I am sure. WookMuff 11:45, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Ned Lowe
Hi, I guess you thought I was vandalizing the Lowe page? The link under Edward Lowe actually leads to a pirate and not a composer. I realize that pirates might be a common subject for vandals, but I did not mean to confuse anyone. Thanks, Mike in PA

LiveJournal Revert
Jeremy, sorry about that. I clicked the wrong diff link and reverted your good faith edit as vandalism by mistake. Please accept my apologies. I'll be much more careful in the future. I'm not even sure why the LJ article appears on my watchlist. Best regards Xdenizen 22:39, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Accepted. I am sure I have clicked something wrong with WP:TW myself.  I was just a little confused with the situation.  --Jerm  (Talk/ Contrib) 22:42, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: the Six Apart page revert from August 8th. My sincerest apologies; I was not aware that I was vandalizing :) I will be more careful in the future, thank you! -Jenn  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Special:Contributions/ (talk)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rollins_College_Seal.svg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Rollins_College_Seal.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. MER-C 12:25, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Georgia Southern/University System of Georgia edits
Jerm, in April 2006, Georgia Southern University received the classification of doctoral/research institution. I provided the link before, but here it is again:

http://www.statesboroherald.com/news/article/5146/

Also, I was simply providing links to the fraternity and sorority pages, so there was no need to revert those edits.

Please pay attention to edits and their references before reverting changes and threatening to have a user blocked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tmoney6975 (talk • contribs) 17:08, 18 August 2007


 * Yes, according to that article, US News as claim/called Georgia Southern a Doctoral/Research university. However, US News does not decided which universities are that classification in the University System of Georgia.  The Board of Regents decides that, and according to them Southern is still a Regional University.


 * Sorry about reverting your linking of fraternity and sorority pages, they got caught up in my haste and I made a mistake.


 * Lastly, please do not add spam links to outside forums. See WP:LINKS --Jerm (Talk/ Contrib) 22:23, 18 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Although copied verbatim, the text was factually accurate. The Georgia Board of Regents' classification is merely for funding purposes, not necessarily based which degrees they confer. The definitive source on college classification nationally is the Carnegie Foundation. That is what all news papers and other factual documents cite when writing about colleges and universities, not funding designations from individual states. The US News ranking classifies colleges according to the Carnegie Foundation's classification for that year. Georgia Southern University does indeed confer doctoral degrees and is therefore considered a Doctoral/Research institution.


 * I'm going to rewrite that section to avoid copyright issues, but I'm keeping the factual aspects of that link. --BWD(talk) 22:07, 19 August 2007 (UTC)


 * No, just because a school offers doctoral or terminal degrees in a subject it does not get classified as a Doctoral/Research school. How the state, that owns the school in this case, classifies them is what should be listed. --Jerm  (Talk/ Contrib) 22:48, 19 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Perhaps I didn't do a good job explaining this. The state's designation is a funding designation; it has little to do with the degrees conferred. Each state has their own terminology and classification standards. The Board of Education through it's member accreditation boards (SACS in this case) does not use each state's funding designation. It has its own which the Carnegie Foundation uses to derive its data. You can argue about the terminology all you want, but the Carnegie classification is the most widely used and sourced. It might be helpful to read the main article. --BWD(talk) 23:17, 19 August 2007 (UTC)


 * By the way, all this is in reference to the Georgia Southern article, not the University System of Georgia article. --BWD(talk) 23:22, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Wikimania Atlanta
Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 07:20, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SGLogoOfficial.svg)
Thanks for uploading Image:SGLogoOfficial.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:30, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

The WikiProject Universities Newsletter: Issue I (September 2007)
The September 2007 issue of the WikiProject Universities newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you for your continued support of WikiProject Universities! --  Noetic  Sage  19:46, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Wikimania 2008/Conference of the Americas
Hello, As you may or may not know, Alexandria, Egypt was selected to host Wikimania 2008. So as to prevent the hard work of the many Wikimedians involved in the Atlanta bid from going to waste, we have decided to host a conference for the Americas. This is in no way an attempt to compete with Wikimania or make a statement against Wikimania.

As one of the people signed up to help with the Wikimania Atlanta bid, we hope you will join us at the Wikimedia Conference of the Americas. We will be having a meeting tonight in IRC tonight (Oct 15) at 9:30PM in #cota-atlanta on irc.freenode.org to discuss the conference. For more information about IRC see.

For more information about the Wikimedia Conference of the Americas see http://www.cota-atlanta.org and our wiki http://www.cota-atlanta.org/wiki.

If you do not wish to receive further notices about the COTA please remove your name from our notify list. --Cspurrier 20:57, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Rivers
I do not understand your objection and strongly disagree with the speedy deletion tag. The article you have flagged is part of the Wikiproject Rivers. The criteria for rivers have been defined in the project's discussion page where the participants have agreed that no rivers is too small in order to be incorporated in the project. The article is not independent, it is part of a series of articles defining the national river network - from headwaters, to various tributaries and then to the main river. This network comprises thousands of interlinked rivers. Eliminating the river you have indicated eliminates one of the links of the network.

Maybe what the project team has decided is wrong and you have the right to disagree. But in that case, the discussion should be carried out withing the project and not by singling out an article of a series of several thousands which all comply to the same criterion.Afil 00:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I am not part of the project... All I see is a no content article. If you feel differently expand it! --Jerm  (Talk/ Contrib) 01:04, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

The WikiProject Universities Newsletter: Issue II (October 2007)
The October 2007 issue of the WikiProject Universities newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you for your continued support of WikiProject Universities! &mdash; Noetic  Sage  20:00, 30 October 2007 (UTC)