User talk:Thekaushiks

simple things
Re Ayikudi Balasubramanya Swami Temple. We create an article once. If other titles are considered appropriate, we use #redirect. For links within the Wikimedia project, we use wikilinks. -- RHaworth 15:28, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Kapala Moksha
For the past month, this has been deleted four times by three separate admins. Wikipedia is not the place to post your unencyclopedic essays. If you do it again, you will be blocked from editing. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - &lt;*&gt; 15:40, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion notice
A tag has been placed on Notable Rama Devotees, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to add more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kai A. Simon 15:42, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

A note about your articles
Many of your article contributions are difficult to read, to assert the importance or notability of the subjects, and repeat content you have put into other articles (and you have already been warned once about that). Please keep in mind that this is an encyclopedia, and we have standards of inclusion (both in terms of the subject of any potential articles, and in terms of understandability of the contributions). Thank you. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - &lt;*&gt; 15:55, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Paruthiyur Krishna Sastri
I've nominated Paruthiyur Krishna Sastri, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Paruthiyur Krishna Sastri satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Paruthiyur Krishna Sastri and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Paruthiyur Krishna Sastri during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. andy 22:29, 26 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Please do not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article. It will not end the deletion discussion. andy 13:59, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Vyakarna, Mimamsa, Tarka Sastra, Vedanta
A "" template has been added to the article Vyakarna, Mimamsa, Tarka Sastra, Vedanta, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Buddhipriya 03:44, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Bharathwaja
A "" template has been added to the article Bharathwaja, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Buddhipriya 04:10, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

RELIABLE SOURCE

The article on Brahmasri Paruthiyur Krishna Sastri had been deleted as there was no reliable source. Those there are several old magazines and articles on him. The most prominant one is "Jayamangala sthothram" written by Sri Anantarama Dikshitar (Volume 2 Chapter 8) has a complete life history of Sri Paruthiyur Krishna Sastri.

Online articles like : External links refer to Sri Paruthiyur Perivayal Story Telling with Music in Tamil Nadu: http://tamilelibrary.org/teliwp/archives/29 Kalakshepam Engira Vyasam: http://www.chennaionline.com/musicnew/CarnaticMusic/165th.asp Art of Story telling: http://www.carnatica.net/harikatha.htm

Please check reliable sources and undelete article. New and fresh information can be provided and the article can be redone well.

Thanks & Regards, kaushiks

Nomination of Hindu Religious Discourses for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hindu Religious Discourses is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindu Religious Discourses until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.