User talk:Thekim2.0

May 2021
Hello, I'm Ashleyyoursmile. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ken Jeong without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Ashley  yoursmile!  12:28, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Steven Yeun, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that.   Ashley  yoursmile!  12:29, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Steven Yeun, you may be blocked from editing. FiberTech (talk) 13:52, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Hi Thekim2.0! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Steven Yeun that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. removing information from articles such as you are should not be marked as a minor edit. Alex (talk) 20:27, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sean Richard Dulake. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Stop changing things without a source when tou clearly don't even make your mind up of what you think is correct. You have changed the information to American, Irish and Welsh despite the source saying British and you being told in edit summaries. You are not improving the article, this is being disruptive and it needs to stop. Alex (talk) 21:24, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Martin Kove, you may be blocked from editing. Notfrompedro (talk) 22:52, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Martin Kove. Notfrompedro (talk) 22:56, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lil Nei
Hello, Thekim2.0,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Mydreamsparrow, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Lil Nei, for deletion, because it is a very short article that doesn't provide readers with enough context to determine who or what the subject is.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion] but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DreamSparrow  Chat   15:51, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:15, 17 July 2021 (UTC)


 * You are changing content in biographies of living persons without citing your source. What's worse, some of this content is already sourced.  It is especially important to cite sources when editing content in biographical articles.  We need to know where you found this information, and we need to know that it comes from a reliable source.  There are many websites that purport to tell facts about celebrities, but few of them are what Wikipedia would consider reliable.  For example, Google Knowledge Graph pulls information from random sites, including Wikipedia itself; tabloid newspapers post titillating gossip without much care for fact-checking; self-published fan sites have no editorial control; and user-generated websites, such as the IMDb, post rumors and conjecture. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:26, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Frances Fisher. You removed sourced content from a BLP, leaving an edit summary stating that something factual was "too personal". Magnolia677 (talk) 19:23, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:51, 19 July 2021 (UTC)