User talk:Theknightswhosay

Image Tagging for Image:Image-AlexRodriguezInterference.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Image-AlexRodriguezInterference.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:05, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

The image was already on Wikipedia.Theknightswhosay 19:19, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Brass.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Brass.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. fuzzy510 04:34, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=721659579 your edit] to Nick Saban may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

7 [List of SEC conference champions#Divisional champions|SEC Championship appearances] (2001, 2003, It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:33, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Nick Saban
Theknightswhosay, I reverted your recent edit at Nick Saban. It was not formatted correctly and was causing the entire infobox display improperly. As for the content you aimed to introduce, it's not standard practice to list conference championship games appearances in the infoboxes for college football coach bio articles. You may want to start a discussion about this at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football. Thanks, Jweiss11 (talk) 11:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Edit warring/using multiple accounts
[harmful posts containing possible libel removed by Theknightswhosay (talk) 05:04, 24 May 2016 (UTC)]

Safehaven86
Safehaven86, go away and leave me alone. I consider any more lectures from you to be harassment. I have never used another account in my life. You really think only one person in the world thinks you're wrong?

Thanks for your contribution though. See here for more. Theknightswhosay (talk) 03:58, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

July 2020
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Stefan Molyneux, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''RT is never to be used as a source on Wikipedia, either. '' Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 07:43, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

I corrected malicious lies Theknightswhosay (talk) 07:50, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 07:53, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to censor or remove encyclopedic content based on the fact that it is offensive to some readers, as you did at Stefan Molyneux, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is not censored, and attempts to censor encyclopedic content will be regarded as vandalism. Grayfell (talk) 08:04, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Stefan Molyneux; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Grayfell (talk) 08:08, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Why isn’t reverting my edits engaging in an edit war? Theknightswhosay (talk) 08:11, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

If you don’t like the edits, you post a request for help. Theknightswhosay (talk) 08:12, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

I know most editors on this page are partisan hacks who want to smear anyone with whom they disagree. Being in the minority doesn’t make someone wrong. Isn’t that what you’re claiming Molyneux says? Theknightswhosay (talk) 08:13, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

It isn’t censoring content when you don’t allow someone who has never espoused white nationalism to be called a white nationalist. Opinion pieces from political opponents presented as fact aren’t encyclopedic. Theknightswhosay (talk) 08:17, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72h for edit-warring with a clear disregard of our sourcing policies. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. User:Ymblanter (talk) 08:53, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Stefan Molyneux for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 09:12, 1 July 2020 (UTC)