User talk:Thelb4/Archive 2

As of
Hi, I was wondering why you were taking away the "As of" links? They're useful to keep track of information for which there is a reasonable possibility of it becoming outdated. &mdash; Matt Crypto 14:15, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Oh, sorry. I didn't realise that. It's... Thelb4! 16:39, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * No problem. I hope you wouldn't mind if I restored the links? (Or you could do so yourself?) &mdash; Matt Crypto 20:42, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

Final Fantasy N64 AfD
Thelb4, I noticed your vote over the Final Fantasy N64 articles for deletion vote. I wasn't sure if you were aware of this, but the article in question is actually redundant. The original article, Final Fantasy SGI demo, has been around for a number of months, and is better cited and researched (IMO, of course). I was wondering if I could ask you to consider changing your "keep" vote to "merge"? If not, I apologize for bothering you. – Seancdaug 02:40, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks on your Support on the RfA
Just curious, what is the IB 4? Karmafist 22:03, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

'IB' stands for the town I live in; 4 is for... no reason. It's... Thelb4! 06:14, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

Image:Ryokosubaru.jpg
The picture should be listed under public domain. AyrtonSenna

FPC
Absolutely. Please edit it away, and upload it under a separate filename as an alternate version. Thanks for your help. :)--Pharos 02:48, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

Cleanup taskforce
Hi, I just added a task to your desk. It may be a bit outside your field - if you are unable to help with the cleanup for any reason feel free to move it to sombody elses desk. Cheers, Andreww 04:59, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

I accept it. It's... Thelb4! 09:17, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Dave Walker
copied from my talk page:

I was assigned the Dave Walker article with the Cleanup Task force. I have done some copyediting and wonder: how 'serious' is the 'serious copyediting'? Do you want all the brackets gone? It's... Thelb4! 13:20, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

reply:
 * grin. Sorry about that.  Serious copyediting means it looked such a mess that I didn't want to do it myself.  I looked at it and it appeared to be just a smear.  It didn't even seem to be in real sentences.


 * I happened to glance at it when I saw it had been assigned, to see if anything was happening, and it already looks a lot better.  Thank you!


 * Do you think the flow needs further improving? Are sections logically grouped? RJFJR 13:34, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Indu
I tried to move it, but I think I screwed up the move. Not sure what your question is. If you think it belongs in the main space rather than Wiktionary that's fine with me. --JJay 16:49, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Calm down. I said I made a mistake, didn't I? It was a first attempt and I have since used the template. --JJay 20:48, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

filthy
Thanks for fixing me on that. Are you sure you can't classify disambuiguation as stub? I mean, it still looks to me like it was a topic that need more information... Altough you might be right about this specific page I've made, let me give you an hipotetical example that I can think of where a stub and disambiguation should be together:

--- The article is called "scrubs"

---
 * scrubs
 * scrubs

Let's suppose both links exist and works. Now, wouldn't this be a stub?

---

What about even another example? Let's say hypoteticaly it's filthy and that everybody knows that it has morethan 2 meanings. Then I want to add 2 meanings now, because I don't have the time to do the rest. I would call it a stub hoping somebody else would do the rest.

closing it up
&larr; Just to leave the text at my side, so it's ok if you want to clear this topic in your talk. :)

oops, forgot to sign o_O --Cawas 00:24, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

POP (and other channel) ratings figures
Are all available from the BARB here. --Kiand 20:56, 10 November 2005 (UTC)