User talk:Theleekycauldron/Projects/Did you know/RfC on prep building

Getting this going
are you on board with this idea / anything you'd like to clean up beforehand? If not, I suggest we put our signatures on the list and get the RfC started :) if you have any reservations, of course, I'm happy to talk about them – this isn't an imperative by any stretch. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 22:08, 4 January 2023 (UTC)


 * I'm uncomfortable putting my name on the will have to reassess its level of activity in that area ultimatum. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:14, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * @RoySmith: Is there a language or substantive change that would make you more comfortable? Obviously, a strike isn't going to go ahead without unanimity, so if that makes you uncomfortable in and of itself, we can just start the RfC and put the strike in a drawer. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 22:23, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Ruminating, I feel the same as Roy ATM. Bruxton (talk) 22:36, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * It looks like we've got several eager new prep-builders who are waiting to do more work. So, I think we should continue to talk about process improvements, but for the moment, my recommendation is to just go to 2-per-day and see how it works out. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:52, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I think so. And I cannot begin to imagine what it has been like for SL93 and Leeky filling two a day for a long time. I think we all realize that this new blood will eventually feel the strain and responsibility. But it is a reprieve and I will take it. I felt a responsibility to fill the preps to get us through the holiday season and then some folks stepped up. So with strong sympathy for the position of SL93 and Leeky. Bruxton (talk) 00:43, 5 January 2023 (UTC)