User talk:Thelittlegiant

Benson and the little giant
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam); and,
 * 4) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. X MarX the Spot (talk) 23:41, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Your Cry for Help!
Hi,

I'm the spoilsport who tagged Benson and the Little Giant as having conflict of interest issues. :) I noticed that you've been working like a trojan to fix it up and seem to be a bit confused. I've asked someone who is very experienced in these matters to take a look at the article. His name is Michael and you might do well to ask him nicely if he can help you out. Kind regards, X MarX the Spot (talk) 02:10, 30 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Yup... Michael here. I'll take a look and see what i can do. Mostly what I see at the moment is you have a LOT of wonderful text about the podcast. pretty much, the more you write, the more sources you need. right now you have 2. I'l look into more. Also, and without trying to belittle any of your fine work, I'll be taking a crack at doing some kind but judicious trimming. Best,  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:20, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

I did just a litle to the article, to make it read a bit better, and I found a nice quote that works toward its notability. No need to give up. Where might I access the sources you used?  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 08:12, 30 October 2008 (UTC)