User talk:Themaster debator

June 2019
Hello, I'm Peaceray. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, United States presidential elections in which the winner lost the popular vote, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 14:32, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

February 2020
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Frank Miller (comics). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Mondo Beer (talk) 08:27, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Lysol, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. --   LuK3      (Talk)   21:01, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

So we are going to leave something that has already been proven to be incorrect under Lysol so it makes Trump look bad? At least be honest about your intentions regarding this article.

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on 86 (term); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. NedFausa (talk) 23:44, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

October 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 00:37, 19 October 2020 (UTC)