User talk:Themata

--Themata 20:57, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:


 * To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type &#126;&#126;&#126; (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (4 tildes).
 * Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
 * If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
 * Follow the Simplified Ruleset
 * Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
 * Remember Neutral point of view
 * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.

Please don't remove VfD notices while the article is still on votes for deletion. &#8212;No-One Jones 23:10, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Please stop inserting your POV into articles. Thank you. RickK 23:20, Sep 5, 2004 (UTC)

If you delete the votes for deletion header again, you will be blocked from editing. RickK 23:22, Sep 5, 2004 (UTC)

I'm VERY interested in the objectivity of Wikipedia. When are you going to start being objective? RickK 23:35, Sep 5, 2004 (UTC)

Please note that we've discussed the issue of the name of the Republic of Macedonia a million times already - see Talk:Republic of Macedonia for previous discussions. If you want to rename the article, I suggest that you justify it on the talk page before trying to rename it. If you keep trying to change it without any discussion, I'm afraid you'll just keep on getting reverted. -- ChrisO 23:36, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)

do me a favor come on msn, my email is themata@in.gr i cant just about objectivity via webpages, it takes too much time.--Themata 23:38, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I have no interest in trying to convince you of anything. WIkipedia has made a consensus decision which it feels is the most neutral. Please abide by it, or go elsewhere. RickK 23:45, Sep 5, 2004 (UTC)

Objection
For the record, I didn't propose Marshal Tito's propaganda over Macedonia for deletion, although I agree that the article should be deleted for the reasons set out by the people who've commented on it. (Don't forget that you have a vote too - see Votes for deletion/Marshal Tito's propaganda over Macedonia. As the author, your view should be heard too.) My aim in this is simply to ensure that the NPOV policy is upheld. I don't think it's appropriate to link to an article that's up for deletion and has so far acquired 8 votes for deletion and only 1 to keep. What's more, the Marshal Tito article covers the same ground as the Macedonia article, so it's redundant anyway. -- ChrisO 00:43, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Please don't write on other people's User pages. If you want to communicate with them, please do so on their Talk pages. RickK 22:46, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)
 * Please consider the comments by RickK above. For the same reason, I removed your comments on User:ChrisO's page. 172 23:46, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)


 * ''from Talk:Marshal Tito's propaganda over Macedonia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joy Joy is from Croatia (Tito's homeland, too powerful democracy of Yugoslavia thanx to his aid, thats why it got most of the magnificent coast and all the islands of Yugoslavia), he is taught what all Yugoslavians are taught. That Macedonians are Slavs. Even Serbs that adore Greeks claim that Macedonians are a different nation etc. He has instilled Tito's campaign in his blood, I cant change it, noone can, only Joy can. But thats too hard, its as hard as for a european is to stop believing in christianism and start praising Islam. So, no reason even to count his vote :) The "court" should have neutral "judgers", not "pawns" of "Marshal Tito's propaganda over Macedonia". Sorry Joy, i dont have anything personal against you, maybe you could be my best friends, who knows. --Themata 01:43, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)

ChrisO improve your maths, my boy you dont know how to count!, and bytheway you are from Yugoslavia too? You are so much against me, Chris0 seems to come from a christian name so I suppose you are either a Slav or an American/British. ( i dont think an italian/spanish/portoguese/german etc would be against greeks and in fond of "macedonian slavs". so whats your nationality? you shouldnt be ashamed of it.. Even if you are a Macedonian Slav, say it, my favorite dish is not Macedonian Slav flesh ;)--Themata 01:43, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)

As for you [Mirv]], keep this; "..nationalist crank..." for your own use. Ah! dont forget to put some lubricant on it before you use it... (bytheway you get horny when you swear at people, does your girl know it? maybe it gonna improve your sexual life if you inform your girl about it! a free small tip for you!)

--Themata 01:43, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)

end moved text

Try to stick to discussing the article, thanks. &#8212;No-One Jones (mail) 01:49, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)

No personal attacks
Themata, I think you should take a look at No personal attacks. If you keep making personal attacks on other users, you are likely to get banned. -- ChrisO 12:22, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Just a question
Sorry, what means to violate??? I actually use today's Greek name of the town (Kilkis). Many of the towns in Bulgaria, Greece and Turkey have Bulgarian, Greek and Turkish names. Other thing - I have just mentioned the names of two Bulgarians born in Kilkis. Bojin 20:43, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)

First of all you messioned 2 names hristo something etc without creating an article about them. Secondly many cities in bulgaria and in turkey have greek names cuz they were founded by greeks, and today have different names which other come from greek one (as Izmir comes from Smyrne) or they are totally changed, in order not to remind that greeks founded them. If I go and change Istanbul article into "constantinaple" is a violation because today Constantinaple belongs to turkey and turks want it to call it Istanbul (bytheway comes from greek "is tin polin"). Furthurmore it would be like saying Istanbul is still greek, its temporarily turkish, that doesnt respect NOV. In addition to these, Kilkis was not under bulgaria's occupation only during World War II, never was officially bulgarian part. So if i change the Istanbul article into Constantinaple, believe me it would be less offensive for turks (cuz istanbul belongs to them today) than what you did in "kilkis" article.

What?
Could u explain this comment om my talk page: "i did, next time instead of making comments, read carefully the dates, and btw what one says in discussion doesnt mean the truth, for god sake!" ??????????? Rienzo 18:20, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Are you gay/"hebrew"?
you are a gay jewish/hebrew male living in thessaloniki, macedonia?


 * I'm a male, consider myself straight, gay-tolerant (sometimes sympathizing), influenced by Thessaloniki's multicultural past and proud to be its inhabitant. :) Etz Haim 21:49, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Thessaloniki on the Article Improvement Drive
Hey Themata! I noticed your work on and interst in Thessaloniki and wanted to let you know that I nominated the city's article for the Article Improvement Drive. It is very close to reaching Featured Article Status and it deserves that recognition. Please feel free to vote for its candidacy at the AID! --Caponer 01:17, 6 March 2006 (UTC)