User talk:Themayor86

Speedy deletion of TrueVision Systems, Inc.
A tag has been placed on TrueVision Systems, Inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironholds 22:54, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of TrueVision 3D HD
A tag has been placed on TrueVision 3D HD, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Bit Lordy (talk) 17:48, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Truevision 3d hd
A tag has been placed on Truevision 3d hd, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 21:24, 24 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Focus more on the history of the company than the products. The article is probably misnamed, and should use the proper company name instead, but that can be fixed easily enough. (Just because an earlier version with the company name was speedy-deleted doesn't mean that title of off limits.) You're actually not too far off from making the article compliant. I must ask, though: Do you have any sort of connection with the company, such as employee, PR person, or anything else? If so, you have likely run afoul of conflict of interest guidelines. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 21:56, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

I am not affiliated with the company. I am a med student and saw this company's product in use in an OR and was very interested. Thank you for the advice. I will change the article name and look into finding more information out regarding company history. I will remain in contact with you as I continue to edit this article. Thanks again.Themayor86 (talk) 22:42, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 21:38, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 02:02, 25 June 2008 (UTC)