User talk:Theme Designs Wizard

February 2016
Hello, I'm Binksternet. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Rainforest Cafe because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 21:30, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

hI. i GET YOUR POINT BUT YOU TOTALLY DELETED IT AND LEFT THE ANIMATORICS SECTION WITH THE VENDOR INTACT. WHAT I PUT IS THE HISTORY OF THIS PART AND CAN UNDERSTAND YOU MINIMIZING MY COMPANY BUT TOTALLY DELETING TAKES AWAY FROM THE STORY. ERIN Theme Designs Wizard (talk) 22:02, 27 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi, Erin. Thanks for pointing me to the animatronics section, where it appears they were promoting themselves with a primary source instead of independent, third party sources. I removed the animatronics section for the same reason I remove the Theme Designs material that you added. All these things need WP:SECONDARY sources to show that they have been noticed by the media. Binksternet (talk) 01:33, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest guideline
Hello Theme Designs Wizard. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice. Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   . If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. - Brianhe (talk) 16:35, 13 November 2016 (UTC)