User talk:Themillofkeytone

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions to the coolest online encyclopedia I know of =). I sure hope you stick around; we're always in need of more people to create new articles and improve the ones we already have.  Here are a few suggestions you might find useful:
 * First, check out the tutorial and learn how to write a great article
 * Find out more about what Wikipedia is and how it works
 * Check out the manual of style and maybe the picture tutorial if you're interested in adding images to your articles
 * Write from a neutral point of view, use wikiquette, and last but not least, be bold!
 * Check out the community portal if you're looking for something to do.
 * Finally, feel free to contact me at my talk page if you have any questions! Remember to sign your name by typing &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;.

Again, welcome! It's great to have you. Happy editing!

And thanks for the vote on my FAC! Glad to see you're already getting involved. Let me know if you need anything. --Spangineer[es] (háblame)  18:54, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Hitler's Religious Beliefs
As far as I know that article was a fork: it was created to try and remove an endlessly controversial section from the Adolf Hitler article, leaving a bare bones description behind. You might also drop a note to the christian User:Str1977. User:Giovanni33 is his atheist nemesis.--Shtove 20:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Dear Mill, I have read your note and understand. However, the actual merge (or identity) of the two articles was undone by Users Giovanni33 and Alienus. Str1977 (smile back) 20:34, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

I support your merger, Themillofkeytone. I don't know why Str1977 insists on keeping the tag there.Giovanni33 00:01, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Gio, you say one thing but do another! You reverted the version on which Mill's redirect merger was based upon. That's why I reinstated the merger note. Str1977 (smile back) 12:44, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Nope. I did not affect the merger at all. The texts were identical. I just restored the texts that you changed on both places. The merger is correct and thus there is no point to have the tag anymore, which you restored.Giovanni33 05:22, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Yep. You changed the text on which Mill's edits were based, thus invalidating his move. Hence the tag has to remain for now. Str1977 (smile back) 16:13, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Dear Mill, thanks for your message. Sure, I agree with you. For me, the issue was merely that you thought the merger accomplished and removed the tags. You were right at that moment, but when the content of the Hitler article was changed, this changed. I also agree about cutting the section in the Hitler article while giving a comprehensive treatment in the Religious Views article. Str1977 (smile back) 08:04, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

COTW Project
You voted for Grocery store, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. Davodd 23:27, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
For the speedy feedback on Purple diamonds - I wanted to be bold, but was worried it might be considered rash! Inner Earth 08:54, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

NeXT
How is this article looking now? Please leave comments on its peer review page. Thanks for your feedback so far. — Wackymacs 14:56, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I've just done some more copy-editing. It would be great if you could help out, thanks for the help so far! — Wackymacs 18:24, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that, it helps a lot. I am now working on adding references and any missing information. — Wackymacs 16:04, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 19:11, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Muhammad Iqbal
Hi - your suggestions have been implemented. Rama&#39;s Arrow 21:20, 28 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I've fixed the reference issues. Could you please take another look, and lemme know if there is anything I've missed? Rama&#39;s Arrow 19:56, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Merger of Marine_Protected_Area and Marine reserve
Hi - Why did you merge these two? No good reason was given by any user. These two terms deal with two differnt things. An MPA is not always a Marine Reserve.



has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

Apple II series
Hello. Can you do me a huge favor by adding tags throughout this article so I can start adding references throughout? — Wackymacs 22:03, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Marine reserve
Who made the request to redir marine reserve to marine protected areas? They are similar but not the same. Marine reserves are a type of marine protected areas but a marine reserve has a specific meaning by law in New Zealand. If you agree that we should revert it I will rewrite it from a NZ perspective. -- Alan Liefting talk 05:56, 20 September 2007 (UTC)


 * oops.. Just noticed that someone else has contacted you about it. -- Alan Liefting talk 05:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)