User talk:Themonsterstack

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Mizu onna sango15 / Discuss 03:28, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Status and Advice
As reviewing administrator, I deleted the article on Arsen Pereymer, not primarily because of the lack of indication of importance, but because the article was wholly promotional, (criterion G11).

A Wikipedia article needs to be written like an encyclopedia article, not a press release--don't praise the   person, say in plain language what they do. Don't talk about their early manifestations of genius--talk only about what they have accomplished. Remember not to copy from a web site -- first it's a copyright violation, but, even if you give us permission according to WP:DCM, the tone will not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable.

Include only material that would be of interest to a general reader coming across the mention of the subject and wanting the sort of information that would be found in an encyclopedia. Do not include material that would be of interest only to those associated with the subject, or to prospective clients--that sort of content is considered promotional. Keep in mind that the goal of an encyclopedia is to say things in a concise manner, which is not the style of  press releases or  web sites, which are usually more expansive.

Additionally, a Wikipedia article needs to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. The references you gave seem to be entirely press releases or based on them. If you can find better, try rewriting the article. But otherwise, promotional or just informative, it will  get  nominated for deletion by a regular deletion process. (You might also want to take a look at the references for Appsbar--they are many of them similarly press releases. ) As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest or as a paid press agent, but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of what the subject wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know.

If I can help you further, let me know on my user talk page.  DGG ( talk ) 20:25, 6 September 2011 (UTC)