User talk:Themungoman

Your creation of the page St.Nicholas.at.wade
A tag has been placed on St.Nicholas.at.wade, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template  to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pinball22 19:23, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Nintendo DS
Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and they have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --Bean915 15:03, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Regarding edits made to Adolf Hitler
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Kari Hazzard ( T  |  C ) 16:31, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Your block
You were blocked for these edits:
 * - We don't care who you are, and you don't get to be mentioned.
 * - an insult put on another user's page.
 * - vandalism.
 * - vandalism.
 * - supporting vandalism.

Then you made which, while a bad edit, is not vandalism.

In other words, out of the eight edits you've made, at most one is valid. You get to be an admin by being here for a long time and having good standing. Yes, indefinite means never unblocked, because I see no reason to continue cleaning up after you. If you think you can be a valid user, respond here, not in email please (blocked users can edit their own talk pages). And no, little of it is automated, most of the reversions are done by users.

"And I've only had the account for a little while." Exactly, but in that little while you've shown yourself to be a bad user, so why should we give you extra time? You'll have to indicate you understand why your edits were bad before I let you back, and you have yet to do that. "There is a reason why I edited the Nintendo DS page but you're probably not interested in that so I'll get to the point." You edited a vandalized version to compliment it instead of fixing the vandalism, which is almost as bad as the original vandalism. --Golbez 22:12, 22 February 2007 (UTC)