User talk:Themusiclover1

October 2015
Hello, I'm Mcmatter. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jane Bordeaux, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 16:46, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jane Bordeaux with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message. $(talk to me) (contributions)$ @ 17:51, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Mcmatter. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Jane Bordeaux seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:34, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 10:56, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

October 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Themusiclover1 (talk)/(contrib) 9:33, 8 October 2015 (PST)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Jane Bordeaux. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 16:49, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Your edits at the Articles for deletion/Jane Bordeaux
Please stop with your disruptive edits at the AfD, I have not changed your message, only removed your second Vote as each user only gets one. The references are still in the discussion they have just been moved to the bottom of the page so they don't interfere with the conversation. If someone clicks on the little number in your message they will be taken to the link. The discussion will be based on Policy based arguments not the number of time you write KEEP. If you would like to have the article kept you need to provide better sources and a policy based argument for it to be kept. Take a look through WP:DISCUSSAFD to help understand the process. Please feel free to ask any questions here I will do my best to help.McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 17:07, 8 October 2015 (UTC)