User talk:Thenationalist.dk

Addition of unreferenced information
I have noticed you have added Denmark to some infoboxes. The infobox should only show what is mentioned in the article. If Denmark(et.al.) are involved in these instances(battles, wars, etc), then a reliable source should be used to prove it. Continued addition of unreferenced information into infoboxes and articles can be considered disruptive editing. Feel free to post any questions on my talk page. --Kansas Bear (talk) 20:50, 23 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your critique. I am still new to wikipedia, and dont know much about how to add references. But i understand you, and will of course now add refferences to what i add on the various articles. Thank you for informing me. - Thenationalist.dk (talk) 14:18, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Italian War of 1542–1546
Since neither Denmark or Christian III are mentioned in the article(which is why they should not be listed in the infobox), how about you draft a couple of paragraphs in a sandbox outlining in-detail Denmark and Christian III's involvement in the Italian war of 1542-1546? Polish it off with reliable sources and then consider adding it to the article. What do you think? --Kansas Bear (talk) 20:24, 10 June 2023 (UTC)


 * I have now made a small sandbox paragram, you can check it out under my user page, and consider if its worth adding. -- Thenationalist.dk (talk) 22:53, 10 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Do you have any sources that can tie that conflict to the Italian war of 1542-1546? --Kansas Bear (talk) 00:42, 11 June 2023 (UTC)


 * I found this:


 * "In November 1541, King Christian III of Denmark signed a treaty with France that presaged a breakdown in negotiations for a settlement of issues still outstanding from the Netherlands-Denmark war of 1534-1536." --Emperor Charles V, Impresario of War, James D. Tracy, page 183-184. --Kansas Bear (talk) 01:12, 11 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Found more:


 * "Emperor Charles V stood by his refusal to recognize Christian of Holstein as King of Denmark and adhered to the dynastic policy that aimed at procuring the Danish throne for Frederick of the Palatinate. Consequently diplomatic relations between the Netherlands and Denmark remained problematic. In 1541 Christian joined the anti-Habsburg opposition in Europe by concluding an alliance with Francis I of France, the chief enemy of the Habsburg monarchy. In 1542 and 1543 the Sound and the Belt were once again closed to Netherlandish shipping. The city of Amsterdam's plan to use violence to force the Sound had no chance of being executed since the provinces of the Netherlands were themselves now in danger. The French attacked in the south, the Gelderlanders in the east, while the Danes were in position with a fleet of their own off the Netherlandish coast. Finally in 1544 at Speyer a peace treaty was concluded; the emperor recognized Christian III as king of Denmark and free passage through the Sound was guaranteed." --"Amphibious Warfare in the Baltic: The Hansa, Holland and the Habsburgs", Louis Sicking, Amphibious Warfare, 1000-1700, ed. Trim and Mark C. Fissel, Brill, 2006, page 91.
 * Thoughts? --Kansas Bear (talk) 01:34, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I think boths are really intresting sources, which i will definetly look into and read. They are also showing how the Dano-Dutch war is connected with the larger Italian war. Will it be okay if i add those sources to my sandbox?-- Thenationalist.dk (talk) 08:42, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Certainly! Just be sure to paraphrase the information. --Kansas Bear (talk) 13:28, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello @Thenationalist.dk I see that you have finally started editing here on Wikipedia. I am glad. I am aware that you are competent enough to make mature changes on articles. I hope that we can work together in good faith and put aside our past disagreements. Good luck!

Sincerely Oxieltro (talk) 02:16, 23 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much, hope we can work it out and good luck to you
 * Sincerely - Thenationalist.dk (talk) 11:30, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
 * You should perhaps consider writing in the discussion page prior to making big changes in articles.
 * Sincerely Oxieltro (talk) 13:45, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Clarity
Make it clear what it is you're changing. Either by writing a summary or by explaining it more elaborately in the discussion page. You make very large edits and I am growing suspicious of their historicity. Since you refuse to elaborate. Oxieltro (talk) 14:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)


 * All im doing with the various Dano-Swedish wars is too insert all the changes in the treaties and territories, so people can get a better understanding of the outcome. - Thenationalist.dk (talk) 10:21, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I am by no means criticizing your action. Please understand that. You're doing good things as far as I can tell, but its important to provide "verifiable" source, like the specific pages within a book. The problem with not leaving very specific sources is that it leaves a lot of room for pseudo history or at the very least biased history to grow - I AM NOT accusing you of this - I hope you see this problem as well. All well. Oxieltro (talk) 11:25, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Draft:Danish invasion of East Anglia into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — SamX &#91;talk · contribs&#93; 18:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the feedback, i have already clicked Publish chnages, so how do i then add it to the edit summary? Should i then but it in my next Edit summary, or what should i do? -Thenationalist.dk Thenationalist.dk (talk) 19:29, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danish invasion of East Anglia (July 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Asilvering were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Danish invasion of East Anglia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Danish_invasion_of_East_Anglia Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Asilvering&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Danish_invasion_of_East_Anglia reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 06:46, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Danish crusades to Estonia
Hello, Thenationalist.dk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Danish crusades to Estonia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Danish crusades to Estonia


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Danish crusades to Estonia, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 06:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Danish invasion of East Anglia
Hello, Thenationalist.dk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Danish invasion of East Anglia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:08, 21 January 2024 (UTC)