User talk:Thenewguy34

=Please read this before posting any messages!=

Here are some guidelines I ask everyone to follow:


 * Follow the talk page guidelines.
 * I prefer informal messages over "Hello, welcome to wikipedia. We are happy to have you here, but unfortunately, blah blah blah...".  I do not like wikipedia's  "formal" messages.  Yet, please remember to keep good clarity.
 * Although admins have the secret right to lead a personal attack, please refrain from leading one against me, as I find them nonconstructive. If you have a problem with me, just say so.  This goes hand-in hand with the previous message.
 * Any question someone asks me here will be answered here. It is too confusing to relay back and forth on talk pages when we can just keep it on one talk page.

Please follow these, and I should be able to get on the same page with you, or sort things out. --Thenewguy34 (talk) 22:15, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

=Messages=

Confirmation?
Despite confirming my account, I am not considered "registered". I remember seeing something about having to "wait 4 days before being registered". Does that have to do with me not being registered yet? --Thenewguy34 (talk) 12:04, 26 May 2012 (UTC)


 * See Autoconfirmed, which takes 4 days and 10 edits. Dru of Id (talk) 12:17, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Template:Spoiler
I notice that Template:Spoiler has been consistently deleted, yet the reason has also been archived beyond my reach. Why was this template deleted? I was going to copy what I have in my sandbox, but since the deleted template is protected, I cannot do it. Why is this? --21:52, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * There was a TFD discussion which resulted in the template's deletion. The content of it appears to be preserved at Wikipedia talk:Spoiler/old template. Robert Skyhawk (T C) 22:34, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Joseph Kony Face.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Joseph Kony Face.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Morning Sunshine (talk) 13:07, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alliance against Hunger and Malnutrition


The article Alliance against Hunger and Malnutrition has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Might be a non-notable organization.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a message on my talk page. @ 07:48, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Question
Why does wikipedia lack proper categorization? For example, Template:Multiple Issues not categorizing something into clean-up when you insert the "cleanup" section into the template? --Thenewguy34 (talk) 13:49, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Try using WP:TWINKLE's tagging tool. It is much easier than doing it manually. Or, add the catogory manually - eg. add [[:Category:articles needing cleanup]]to the bottom of the article. Mdann52 (talk) 15:46, 22 July 2012 (UTC) Mdann52 (talk) 15:46, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Archaeplastida in Protist article
Hi, Thenewguy34. I responded to the question you raised in Talk:Protist. Essentially, there's nothing wrong with talking about archaeplastids in the protist article (most are arguably protistan, as the term is commonly used), but you're quite right that it's wrong (or at least very confusing) to put them in the taxobox under "Protista Haeckel, 1866", as if the group were formally placed within the old biological kingdom.  Deuterostome  (Talk) 14:00, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Teenager
There is nothing wrong with this term. It's precise and refers to an age range. "Youth" "Young" and the other substitutions you are forcing into articles by edit warring are less precise. Would you please stop it? Thank you, Antandrus (talk) 13:26, 12 August 2017 (UTC)


 * I am making this edits because they are not accurate within this time period. Adolescence itself did not exist as a concept before World War II and using these terms within the articles I have tried to change them in are historically misleading.


 * Let me give you another example of where this might be more problematic: if we wrote an article using the term "teenage" to refer to Jesus of Nazareth would that not be reverted? In regards to that time period, Jesus would have been an adult at age 13, when adolescence starts in modern culture.  The question of an article like Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart is no more different; the term "teenager" is misleading, as it is gives a misleading impression of what Mozart's life was like when he was in that age range.  A scholar would never settle for the usage of the term "teenager" in this time period due to it belonging to another time period, and given that Wikipedia is a site that attempts to follow scholarly standards, why would we be any different?  --Thenewguy34 (talk) 13:32, 12 August 2017 (UTC)


 * You are trying to restrict articles to an MOS:INUNIVERSE vocabulary and concepts, which is specifically discouraged by Wikipedia policy. This affectation is inappropriate in a contemporary encyclopedia, just like restricting analysis of Shakespeare's plays to Elizabethan English would be inappropriate. If you persist in this affectation you will receive warnings from multiple editors, and will soon risk being banned from Wikipedia. Please stop making these changes, and undo any you have already done. Reify-tech (talk) 14:20, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Help me
Eve Teschmacher currently redirects to Superman (1978 film). However, Eve Teschmacher also makes a number of appearances in the show Supergirl, and may have made a couple of cameo appearances in some of the comics. What would be the appropriate template to put onto the article Superman (1978 film) to indicate that Eve Teschmacher should no longer redirect to this article, but should instead be made into its own article? --Thenewguy34 (talk) 15:21, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Follow this link and now you can be able to edit it directly. –Ammarpad (talk) 19:18, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Areas that have enabled discretionary sanctions
w umbolo  ^^^  22:33, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

w umbolo  ^^^  22:33, 1 December 2018 (UTC)