User talk:Thenyrazan

Welcome!
Hello, Thenyrazan, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Jana Adarsha Multiple Campus, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! SorryNotSorry ✽ ✉  11:27, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Jana Adarsha Multiple Campus


A tag has been placed on Jana Adarsha Multiple Campus, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://edusanjal.com/college/jana-adarsha-multiple-campus. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SorryNotSorry ✽ ✉  11:27, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve FECON
Hi, I'm JamesG5. Thenyrazan, thanks for creating FECON!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Unsourced, uncategorized, questionable notability, WP:NPOV not met in language. Possible [{WP:COI]]. Very close paraphrase. Needs extensive re-write.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

JamesG5 (talk) 05:06, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of FECON


The article FECON has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Multiple issues in this article, see maintenance tags. Please address the issues listed there.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesG5 (talk) 05:08, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve FECON
Hi, I'm JamesG5. Thenyrazan, thanks for creating FECON!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please see H:CAT for help on categories, use existing ones rather than creating new from scratch. Company's own website doesn't satisfy WP:GNG, please add reliable third party sources. Claims like "highly recognized" and "due recognition" need sources and must meet WP:NPOV.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

JamesG5 (talk) 05:56, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Please do not remove the maintenance tags and PROD until all the issues are addressed. Specifically and most importantly you need to add valid sources other than its own website, and address the promotional language. JamesG5 (talk) 05:58, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about FECON
Hello, Thenyrazan,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether FECON should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/FECON.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

JamesG5 (talk) 02:08, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Siwakoti) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Siwakoti, Thenyrazan!

Wikipedia editor Anoptimistix just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thanks for your contributions ! Keep on contributing"

To reply, leave a comment on Anoptimistix's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Anoptimistix (talk) 17:30, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tiger Baba


The article Tiger Baba has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not a notable person."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 21:29, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Tiger Baba for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tiger Baba is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tiger Baba until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dial911 (talk) 06:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)