User talk:Theo777

Hey dude, a consensus of editors of article "Song of Solomon" (who don't necesarily often agree on other matters) have rejected your lame "King James porno version" stupid pseudo-"translation"[sic] for reasons which have been sufficiently enumerated at Talk:Song of Solomon. Continuing to re-spam your link into won't do anything to change the article, but it very well could get your account banned from Wikipedia. AnonMoos 20:09, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

You've been rumbled, Dean. Take your pornographic self-promotion elsewhere. Vilĉjo 09:53, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

3RR warning
Your editing at Song of Solomon has been brought to the attention of administrators at WP:ANI. You are in violation of WP:3RR. JodyByak, yak, yak 11:44, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. JodyByak, yak, yak 11:46, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

May 2010
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Mahabharata. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you. Abecedare (talk) 06:36, 10 May 2010 (UTC)