User talk:Theodorekao1

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Theodorekao1. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Guo Wengui, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. ''Moreover, please use reliable secondary source for encyclopedic content. Wikipedia is not a webhost of publishing primary source Matthew_hk   t  c '' 12:12, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Guo Wengui, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please cite the content with reliable secondary source Matthew_hk   t  c  13:57, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Guo Wengui. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please don't use wikipedia to publish primary source Matthew_hk   t  c  16:51, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Guo Wengui. Matthew_hk  t  c  06:22, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Guo Wengui shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Matthew_hk  t  c  06:22, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. 331dot (talk) 13:39, 28 April 2018 (UTC)