User talk:Theopolisme/Archive 8

Jay Merrick re final corrections on Lynch Architects article
Dear Theo -

I'm extremely grateful for your assiduous help in fine tuning the Lynch Architects article. You may have gathered that I'm barely computer-literate. I've removed the half dozen or so Wiki-linked references you mentioned and replaced them with reliable neutral sources (Encyclopaedia Britannica, Penn University). You mention a couple of mis-spellings: my British spell-checker can't find them, and neither can I, and so I assume this is a reflection of the UK-US special relationship in language!! In any case, I trust that this won't be a fatal cause for refusal.

Here's the link to the updated article:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Lynch_Architects&action=submit

Best, Jay — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jay Merrick (talk • contribs) 08:09, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

STOP
Are you using a bot? Stop it now. You're adding italic titles to families, orders, and even anatomy articles. That is not correct. Jesus. I don't even know how to fix how many articles you're incorrectly adding italic titles to.-- O BSIDIAN  †  S OUL  08:31, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok... you've stopped a few hours ago... *sigh*. Now how are you going to fix it? It seems like 5 or more out of every 10 of articles your bot added an title to is wrong and must be reverted. Heck from the top 20 alone, only 5 of the articles have been correctly italicized. And you've changed at least 500 articles. *hits panic button* --  O BSIDIAN  †  S OUL  08:49, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Seriously. Not to mention that a large fraction of those articles to which you added already had that tag in place. Please don't do anything like that again. Hqb (talk) 10:02, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Theo, you need to answer these questions fairly quickly otherwise I may temporarily have to withdraw your access to AWB until it's cleared up. If you are using a bot please provide a link to your approved bot account. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:06, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't know what happened - I had one terminal window open and I saw the entire contents of the article, and if it met all the requirements at WP:ITALIC, I went ahead and hit "y" - I was doing that at a 2-3/minute rate, as I was also trying to do some other stuff (IRL) - and I swear, I have no idea where half of those edits came from - I want to think it was something running in the background, but I checked my logs and it appears that the only edits that I physically made were those 2-3 minute. I'm definitely straying away from tagging now, as I don't know where those other edits came from (it was probably a problem with the scripts).... but I would have no objections to me being required to manually trying to look through there and fix all the problems I caused before I'm allowed access to any semi-automated tools again. Again, I'm so sorry, and this definitely won't happen again.  Theo polisme  :) 13:11, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * To clarify, I was not using a bot, but rather a script for PyWikipedia thst required me to review each entire article - which is why I am baffled as to why I didn't see half of the edits I supposed "made" in the tool... I'm obviously not going to be using it again until I know what those problems were.  Theo polisme  :) 13:13, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Just started going through my contributions, and I really appreciate all of your help reverting this hellish mess. I'm still going to look through them again, though.  Theo polisme  :) 13:15, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I've just completely started over with setting up the tool - it should would now (I believe the problem was that when it called the API, the API responded with multiple pages - so I've set a new rule to automatically abort if it receives >1 articles at a time, as well as another rule to auto abort if my account makes more than 5 edit/minute. I'm going to do a small test now and see if it works (to let you all know).  Theo polisme  :) 13:36, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm incredibly grateful for all of your assistance, and, while I'm confident that the script will now function as intended, I will not do anything else with it without your express "approval", shall we say - I don't want to cause a jarring mistake like this again.  Theo polisme  :) 14:01, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Just as an added note, as seen on Iberoraphidia and Stumpffia, if the article has a functioning and correctly formatted Taxobox/automatic taxobox/species box then the title will already be italicized with no need of the  template.  So adding it is redundant and not needed.-- Kev  min  § 14:11, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Theo, we appreciate your enthusiasm and I am fully aware that all your edits and project work are in the very best of intentions, but I have been having concerns for quite a while now about what often appears to be a lack of attention to detail. I'm obviously not going to take any admin action but I would like you to firmly  agree that you will not use any semi-automated tools whatsoever for a couple of days, whether they are AWB, Huggle, Bubble, Stiki, Eskimo, Lilipop, Lolipop, Twinkle, or any other scripts.  You'll probably be able to use that time to get  your computer sorted out, help out with some of the issues at the CVU that Worm has addressed,  and do  some content  work. In the meantime I will be checking to see if the use of any of the features of PyWikipedia requires a registered, approved bot account. Take care. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:16, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I think that sounds fair, so -- I firmly agree that I will not use any semi-automated tools whatsoever for a couple of days, whether they are AWB, Huggle, Bubble, Stiki, Eskimo, Lilipop, Lolipop (hehe), Twinkle, or any other scripts.  Theo  polisme  :) 14:22, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello everyone, I should have said this sooner but I have just become aware of the discussion. I was the one who wrote that faulty script and sent it to Theo asking him to trial it to see if it works properly. I would like to take full responsibility for this as it was my script and I sent it to him when he was just trying to help. I would have been the one making those edits but I have been using my laptop lately as I am on a trip and it seems to hate coding. I would like for Theo's semi-automated tool rights to be re-enabled and for mine to be taken away temporarily. Thank you Theo for trying to fix the script and I am sincerely sorry that you received this blame when it should have been me. -- Cheers,  Riley Huntley talk  22:28, 25 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I was asleep. Anyway, as long as it's fixed now I'm fine with it. I know it was good intentioned. In the future, know that only the ranks of genus, species, and below are italicized (short of cultivars), everything above it (subtribe, tribe, family, superfamily, suborder, order, class, etc.) are not italicized.-- O BSIDIAN  †  S OUL  23:38, 25 August 2012 (UTC)


 * OK, I hope you have both learned something from this. The use of scripts is restricted to the ranks of genius ;) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:45, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * -- O BSIDIAN  †  S OUL  02:53, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 *  Theo polisme  :) 03:34, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

The problem may not yet be fixed. This edit doesn't come under WP:ITALIC and seems wayward. --Stfg (talk) 13:59, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * That was simply me... I had seen italicized dates in other Beethoven/Mozart articles and just assumed it was correct, apologies.  Theo polisme  :) 14:02, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * On another note, I'd like to request permission to go through Category:Eleutherodactylus_stubs and add italic title to those pages that are an actual species and do not include an infobox to already automatically italicize the title... may I do this?  Theo polisme  :) 14:30, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Theo I honestly think  there are more urgent  asks on  Wikipedia that  you could be helping us with and that  you  should leave scripts well  alone for a while -  if something  goes wrong again I or someone else would have to  block you and neither of us want  that.  I  hope you  don't think I'm being patronising but  I've dropped enough  subtle hints and I believe that  your time would be better spent by  reducing  that  bureaucracy  at  CVU that  you  were jointly   responsible for. There is still  more talk there and edits spent on  creating  superfluous pages and micro-templates than on active counter-vandalism, and the pages are beginning  to look  like Christmas trees. Using your influence there would be immensely constructive and there would be no risk of wrecking the Wikipedia. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:09, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Please see this... And Kudpung, I sincerely do appreciate your advice and the time you're giving me.  Theo polisme  :) 15:33, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Jay Merrick re final corrections on Lynch Architects article
Dear Theo -

I forgot to close my message with the four symbols. Here's the latest revised version of the Lynch Architects article:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Lynch_Architects&action=submit

And the correct sign-off!

Best, Jay

Jay Merrick (talk) 14:18, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ - I've approved the article and moved it to the main article area, see Lynch Architects. :)  Theo polisme  :) 14:26, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

An invitation for you!
Happy editing! AutomaticStrikeout 20:43, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your help in providing instructions for the schedule. Please note that there should be an allowance made for two dates, a start date and an ending date. As of now, I think there is only date allowed for (I could be wrong, though). AutomaticStrikeout 21:02, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Hmm... Is the end date a set date? Like, "5 days after" or something? Or does it vary? If it doesn't change, I could very simply make a version of Day+1 that added 5 days (or whatever) to whatever date they set as the start date... but if it varies, I guess we'd have to do something else... Let me know!  Theo polisme  :) 21:14, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I should have added that the plan is for each article to get one week. Of course, not everything is all ironed out yet, but I believe one week is the current plan. AutomaticStrikeout 21:17, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Ryan started a thread on the talk - whatever the verdict there, I'll go ahead and make a template for it .... or better yet, how about I just make a custom template especially for the WP:TAFI Schedule page that just does everything? I.E., you type in and then it spits out:


 * 09-09-12 to 09-16-12


 * Sound okay?  Theo polisme  :) 21:22, 25 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Sounds great! Also, it is helpful to leave talkbacks at my page. However, I'm about to leave for a while, so I won't be available to help set up the TAFI project for the next 2-3 hours. AutomaticStrikeout 21:25, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

With regards to your plans for archiving the nominations, both successful and otherwise, would it be a good idea for me to make Today's article for improvement/Archives/Successful Nominations and Today's article for improvement/Archives/Unsuccessful Nominations blue links? Would doing so interfere with your plans for archiving by month? AutomaticStrikeout 23:35, 28 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Hmm... I don't think those would really "work", if you know what I mean... Wouldn't we just want to have an archive for each month? Maintaining those pages would require some complicated moving around/transclusions/maybe a bot/who-knows-what - I think the easiest thing to do is just have a bot archive completed requests to /Archives/MONTH...  Theo polisme  23:39, 28 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Rather than setting an archive date, I think we should set the archive to one year (or something similar). Then, when something is closed place User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow around it. Ryan Vesey 23:44, 28 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Well, we could use those pages as "headquarters" for the archives, with links to monthly archives there. My feeling is that it would be helpful to have a central place where one can access all the archives, even if it's just a list containing links to the monthly archives. When a nomination passes or fails, it can be removed from the current nominations page, and added to either the successful or unsuccessful archives (whatever the case may be) for that month. The redlinks above will contain links to the monthly archives. We might also want to keep a record of the schedules, for future reference. AutomaticStrikeout 23:47, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Maybe we should discuss this on the project talk page instead? AutomaticStrikeout 23:56, 28 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Ryan, I thought the idea was to set archive now to the TAFI Nom Top template. As far as Automatic's idea ... I like it, actually. The only thing it would require is probably manual archiving, unless someone wrote a bot specifically for it (as it has the different pages/etc) Also, I've closed the nom for Culture - do we have some sort of "Future TAFI" template, or do we just wait until it actually starts?  Theo polisme  23:57, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Moving... to WT:TAFI now.  Theo polisme  23:58, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Wikilove!

 * Thanks! Yeah - my userpage was really getting on my nerves, so I decided to make it something I would actually enjoy seeing.  Theo polisme  :) 18:41, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, if you like things you enjoy seeing, you should check out Featured picture candidates, where all the quality pictures go to get featured status. Vote on a few!  Mysterytrey 18:47, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

You've got mail
ArchaicMatters (talk) 23:01, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

VS
User_talk:West.andrew.g I think he makes some valid points, but what should we do with what he said. I, for once, don't know where to take this project next. Dan653 (talk) 01:21, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Food for Thought
Village_pump_(proposals) Thought you'd be interested since I emailed you about it. So now the hierarchy would be talk-->ANI-->RFC/U-->ArbCom. Dan653 (talk) 01:37, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The debate has not been closed. Redirecting civility  issues to  AN/I is not  part of the proposal, and where it  may been touched upon, there is significant resistance to  cluttering up  up  the already overloaded admin board -  especially with invalid requests for non-admin intervention. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:36, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

DRN needs your help!
Hey there Theopolisme, I noticed that you haven't been very active at the dispute resolution noticeboard lately where you listed yourself as a volunteer - I was hoping if you had some spare time if you could take a look there and offer some assistance. Thanks again for your help :-) Steven   Zhang  Help resolve disputes! 11:31, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

UAA
Hi Theopolisme, I noticed you reported Brittgourmet to UAA as a promotional username. It declined the request because the user has been editing constructively, rather than making promotional edits. In cases like this, where the user has not made promotional edits, it is best to discuss the username with the user first - they may will willing to request a name change or create a new account, without the need to block them. That tends to be a friendly and less bitey way of dealing with newcomers who are not obviously out to promote something. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 22:40, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Zip - dreadfully sorry... I misread the options in Twinkle (I thought I was warning the user, rather than reporting them.. I typically just warn them/mention it to them manually, but hadn't see that tab before and thought it was a new addition.). Do you know of a way to add the option to warn the user for a username to Twinkle (or some other tool)? Thanks -  Theo polisme  22:44, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Agh, I see it now. Sorry... I don't know why I looked there...  Theo polisme  22:46, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Heh, that's alright then - if it was only a technical mistake, it's not much of an issue. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 22:49, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 August 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 06:54, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
JetBlast (talk) 20:50, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coast Community College district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orange County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:20, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is approved!
Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 15:34, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code you were emailed. If you did not receive a code, email wikiocaasi@yahoo.com your Wikipedia username.
 * To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
 * If you need assistance, email or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
 * A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
 * HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
 * Show off your HighBeam access by placing on your userpage
 * When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Talkback
Electric Catfish 22:14, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Another talkback. Electric Catfish 22:33, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm alsoe being denied access to the CVUA IRC channel because I'm not "registered with services". Can you please register me? Thanks, Electric Catfish 22:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC).
 * That's freenode's services, and it is usually done by one's self, I assume it doesn't require anything from another CVUAer to get in. Try "/msg NickServ help register" without quotes to register.  Mysterytrey 22:46, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Darn, the -er beat me to it. :) Yep, that's exactly correct, Mystery.  Theo polisme  22:51, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Yup. And the worst thing about it - no matter how many times you clutter up my watchlist with userpage changes, I'll be here.  Mysterytrey 23:01, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Agh, I was really hoping some dummy edits would scare you away.  Theo polisme  23:51, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I was hoping I would annoy you by leaving these messages to trigger your "new messages" and making you think you have some business to deal with.  Not really though, so until I see you again,  Mysterytrey 23:57, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Users must be registered to access the channel due to a proxy bot that has been joining the channel under several IP address's and names. -- Cheers,  Riley Huntley talk  00:12, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

By the way, how do you turn off the message banner? Electric Catfish 12:14, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * What, the "new messages" yellow banner? I think there's some sort of CSS hack you can use to make it all white or something - I don't really know though.  Theo polisme  19:30, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Good catch
[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dejan+iliev&diff=510182647&oldid=510161086 Good catch], I didn't spot the edit history for some reason! Noom talk stalk 22:09, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks - yeah, the only reason I caught it at all was cause I was looking at Special:NewPagesFeed... my current refuge from reality.  Theo polisme  22:11, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Another good catch! Electric Catfish 22:51, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks!  Theo polisme  23:09, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Panjistani
Regarding the Potowari/Panjistani, Panjistani articles; this user has replaced potohari with panjistani in many articles and has added the statement - Modern panjistani langague is the name ascertained by Raja Mohammd Afzal Khan of london UK (2009/2010) and some other people - in quite a few articles. I am unable to find references online where Potohari or a modern dialect is termed as Panjistani. It will be helpful if you keep an eye on both the users edits. Thanks. Samar Talk 19:48, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Agh, the cursed "language-spammer" -- will do. Thanks for letting me know, and I'll keep my eyes open. Like your signature, by the way.  Theo polisme  19:53, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
 * As an aside, do you know if anyone has warned them?  Theo polisme  19:55, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
 * No, I don't think so. User Kwamikagami has been reverting some of his edits but I don't see anything aside it. I just come across this editor and found out a whole panji web woven.  Samar  Talk 20:01, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello
Hello Theo,

My name is Richard Kang. I am the CEO and President of Wipit, Inc. I am quite new to Wikipedia and am doing my best to learn how to be a good citizen of the this incredible community.

I created an article just a few minutes ago describing my company and took great effort to only utilize content which we completely own and that is written in a manner that is neutral and only factual in tone.

I have written an email granting Wikipedia license to the work found in our website which is now pending and have added proper citations to the claims made in the article. I am hoping to have this article describing our company published and available to the public, as we have made a significant amount of progress since last I tried, and I believe that having a reference about us on Wikipedia would be of value to those who are looking to learn more about us.

If you have any suggestions on how I can be a good citizen in the community, I would deeply appreciate some pointers. Thank you very much for your contribution to such a great organization.

Best Regards, Richard Kang

Kangrichard (talk) 03:42, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Richard - thanks a lot for reaching out. I see you've filed an OTRS ticket, and you're definitely on the right path. Be sure to read WP:COI, however, if you haven't already - it's definitely an informative read. Please let me know if I can help you in any other ways! Cheers,  Theo polisme  03:52, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Electric Catfish 14:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for being so incredibly speedy with it!  Theo polisme  14:54, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

 * Don't worry about adding another - I've watchlisted you. Thanks,  Theo polisme  03:47, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Study Islandlogo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Study Islandlogo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
 * - Fixed but you might want to check it anyways. -- Cheers,  Riley Huntley talk  07:17, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Riley. ...Hrm, that was odd.  Theo polisme  07:25, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

File:A11v 1094228.ogg
FYI, this file is located on commons, so you'll have to request a rename. TDL (talk) 20:51, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Ah, how true. Don't know how I missed that... Cheers,  Theo polisme  00:17, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 September 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 12:29, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page. In this issue: Read the entire first edition of The Olive Branch -->
 * Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
 * Research: The most recent DR data
 * Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
 * Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
 * DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
 * Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
 * Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

--The Olive Branch 19:34, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Regarding Talk:The Yogscast
Based on your decline note, it seems you're a bit confused about the page. I moved Yogscast to The Yogscast, and should have automatically moved the talk page as well. However, Talk:The Yogscast is already occupied by a deletion notice placed erroneously by a bot a year and a half ago. This means that the page has already been moved, but its talk page is currently at Talk:Yogscast because of that holdup. I presume this qualifies as G6 (non-controversial maintenance) to move a talk page with its host.  elektrik SHOOS  (talk) 21:08, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Ah, very true. I did not notice/realize Talk:Yogscast existed, and due to the fairly, shall we shall, "routine" nature of the wording of the G6 template, I had no idea what you were aiming for in this particular instance: my apologies. Is there a way to specify additional detail in G6 template? Or would that require just using the basic db-reason template? Cheers,  Theo polisme  21:13, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
 * There is a rationale parameter, but I was a bit vague the first time around. Hopefully this second tag should clear things up for anyone else. Thanks!  elektrik SHOOS  (talk) 21:17, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Happy to help! Also, it's a bit odd that it's been this long since I've actually spoken with you... I've seen your name consistently in my watchlist, but I suppose it's always good to foster actual interaction.. albeit through a screen... but I digress.  Theo polisme  21:19, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm one of those names that pops up a bit everywhere. I see your name pop in here and there, and it's nice to talk with you, too. Also, regarding the talkback notices, I typically remove them once I've read the message so my archives aren't clogged with them. It's fine to leave new ones if there's new messages.  elektrik SHOOS  (talk) 21:23, 4 September 2012 (UTC)