User talk:Thephantom1979

District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871
Please stop removing relevant, sourced content from the article. If you think it should be removed, discuss it on the article's talk page. ... disco spinster   talk  21:09, 13 November 2022 (UTC)


 * I removed the section because it devalues the content.
 * The purpose of the 1871 Act is to learn about history.
 * Qanon has nothing to do with that.
 * It's very confusing and misleading. Thephantom1979 (talk) 21:12, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
 * It might be confusing to you, but that's no reason to remove it. ... disco spinster   talk  21:14, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
 * What does Qanon have to do with 1871?
 * Qanon is not relevant to history.
 * When people learn about this act.
 * IF they see Qanon attached to it.
 * They might not even think the Act is real.
 * 1871 is a real act. Thephantom1979 (talk) 21:16, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't think you guys can explain what does Qanon have to do with Historical content? Thephantom1979 (talk) 21:19, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
 * The Act was used by QAnon adherents in their conspiracy. Wikipedia is not just about history but also how subjects are treated in the present. ... disco spinster   talk  21:32, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Qanon is not an offical corporation or entity.
 * If it was an offical entity that would make sense.
 * There is no such legal entity as Qanon that I am aware of.
 * This is why it water downs the content.
 * We are mixing an opinion of an group that has not real offical legal structure.
 * If we are to use sources.
 * Those sources should be offical entities. Not random opinions of none legal entities. Thephantom1979 (talk) 21:38, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
 * If you guys want to leave it there. It doesn't hurt me one bit.
 * It's trashy in my view.
 * Qanon isn't a real entity.
 * From what I know about it.
 * It's a group of people with opinions about the world.
 * The 1871 Act is not an opinion.
 * It's a historical fact.
 * I don't get why an opinion from a group that has no real legal structure matters to history. Thephantom1979 (talk) 21:44, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
 * You need to gain consensus for any change you want to make at Talk:District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871. Cullen328 (talk) 22:19, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
 * It's ok. I am not going to spend anymore time on this.
 * I am a software engineer for a living.
 * My brain is hardwired to question the logic of information.
 * Adding Qanon which is not a real organization is not logical to me.
 * Their opinion does not matter in this context.
 * I won't share this article with anyone now.
 * If someone sees Qanon on it.
 * They might think the 1871 act isn't real at all.
 * Which alters the perception of history. Thephantom1979 (talk) 22:31, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello, I'm Harobouri. I noticed that you recently removed content from District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Harobouri T • C (he/him) 21:10, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to censor or remove encyclopedic content based on the fact that it is offensive to some readers, as you did at District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is not censored, and attempts to censor encyclopedic content will be regarded as vandalism.''You've already done this three times. Again, please stop,'' Harobouri T • C (he/him) 21:12, 13 November 2022 (UTC)


 * It's not disuptive editing.
 * You guys cannot explain what does Qanon have to do with a historical act.
 * Mixing the two together will give the reader the idea that this Act is not even real in the first place. Thephantom1979 (talk) 21:21, 13 November 2022 (UTC)