User talk:Thepirateer123

Speedy deletion of Image:137643 5K3RPAYDOFIYCAR2JB1GCEJSW1MPQX 8 H135550 L.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:137643 5K3RPAYDOFIYCAR2JB1GCEJSW1MPQX 8 H135550 L.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mayalld (talk) 10:43, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop uploading copyrighted images and claiming they are yours, as you have done above and you did with, both of which are now deleted. It is not appropriate to upload copyrighted work to Wikipedia. Continuing to do so could lead to you being blocked for disruption. Thanks, Gwernol 10:48, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008
Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Image:Bingle1.jpg. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 11:08, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Daniel macp..jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Daniel macp..jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mayalld (talk) 11:39, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Brodie MacPherson
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Brodie MacPherson, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 14:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brent Street Studios


The article Brent Street Studios has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability. Still no sources despite being tagged for well over 2 years.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:00, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Talent Development High School


The article Talent Development High School has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability. No sources, despite being tagged for over two years.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:03, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Brent Street Studios
I have nominated Brent Street Studios, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Brent Street Studios. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. JamesBWatson (talk) 06:52, 5 July 2010 (UTC)