User talk:Theprodjuicer

Speedy deletion of Margaret Sheridan - Sculptor
A tag has been placed on Margaret Sheridan - Sculptor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mister Senseless&trade; (Speak - Contributions) 01:36, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problem follow-up: Margaret Sheridan - Sculptor
Dear Theprodjuicer:

I see that you indicate that you have sent an e-mail to the Wikimedia Foundation verifying permission to use this material, but since it has not yet been recorded by a member of the Communications Committee, I'm afraid that either the e-mail may have gone awry or it may not have fully addressed concerns. Ordinarily, such letters are processed within a few days, although occasionally heavy traffic may cause delays. I'd like to ask you to please consider resending your letter, since if we cannot verify permission to duplicate this text, we will have to remove it.

If you do choose to resend the letter, please make sure that it covers all necessary elements. Your e-mail should be sent to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org]. It should clearly include the name of the article on Wikipedia as well as the url of the site or sites being duplicated. It should be sent by an e-mail address that is clearly connected to the source(s). The language of the release should be similar to our boilerplate consent form. (Please note that unless the material is released into public domain, it should be released under GFDL, which allows modification and reuse, commercially or otherwise, so long as credit is provided for authorship.) You can take a look at Requesting copyright permission for more detail.

It would probably also be a good idea, if you decide to resend the letter, to note that you have done so and on what date on the article's talk page to help prevent its premature deletion. If permission is not verified in a timely manner, the article is likely to be deleted, but even if that should happen, it can be restored as soon as copyright problems are addressed.

If you have questions about the verification procedure, please feel free to contact me at my talk page. Thank you.--Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:44, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Update regarding copyright concern
Since we do not yet have verification of permission by the processes set out above and sufficient time has passed since the placement of the notice, the article has been deleted for copyright concerns. This deletion is not necessarily permanent. If you have already sent a letter to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), the article will be restored when that letter is received and processed by the Wikimedia Communications committee. Likewise, if you have not yet sent a letter, you still may, and the article will be restored when that letter is received and processed.

As Wikipedia does not require proof of identity on account creation, it is essential that we receive external proof of authorization in order to ensure that we remain compliant with US Copyright law. It is also essential that we verify that copyright holders understand the extent of the release they are authorizing, in that GFDL permits modification and reuse in any forum, even commercial publication, as long as authorship credit is maintained.

If you have questions about the verification procedure, please feel free to contact me at my talk page. Alternatively, you might address them at the talk page of the copyright policy, which is generally monitored by volunteers experienced in processing such matters. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 03:06, 25 November 2008 (UTC)