User talk:Therapyisgood/Archive 1

Use of multiple accounts
Hi Therapyisgood. Are either or  you? -- Guerillero &#124;  Parlez Moi  15:58, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

FAC
We're done. Can will you make your decision? LittleJerry (talk) 01:46, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  15:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Therapyisgood is ✅ to

These accounts do not qualify for any kind of privacy reasons. Under WP:VALIDALT, Privacy, Under WP:PROJSOCK which is in the inappropriate uses section of that page, Editing project space  You may not use multiple accounts to edit the project namespace...anything beginning in Wikipedia or Wikipedia talk. That includes RfAs or anything listed under "Wikipedia:Featured list candidates" also.

Your complaints are invalid...all of it. That includes the baloney about being locked out of your account so that you just had to create Buchanan3 to edit that RfA. Garbage. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  15:39, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Email
Thanks for your email, not really my territory as it involves a checkuser block. You could go to Unblock Ticket Request System though.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  18:21, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Lewis (baseball)
Hi Therapyisgood - I would agree about "a Major League Baseball" but when you reduce it to MBA the first sound is an "em" which takes "an". A search of Wikipedia articles for "an MLB" gives 649 matches - whereas a search for "a MLB" gives 5 matches - including Lewis (baseball) and four quotations, which we don't change, even though they are wrong. I'll leave you to revert yourself - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 18:29, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Disagree. I go on what's right, not the number of search results. Therapyisgood (talk) 19:14, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * So, 650 people (649 plus me) are wrong, and you are right? - sounds unlikely You probably don't want to read this - although I couldn't find an example for MLB - it does cover NBC - it is the sound, not the letter. - Arjayay (talk) 19:26, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Again the number of people saying something is totally and wholly irrelevant. However here and here seem to indicate the acronym's article is based on how it sounds, so I'll change it back. Regards. Therapyisgood (talk) 19:43, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for doing that - happy editing - Arjayay (talk) 20:15, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Account restriction (User:Therapyisgood)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

Support: Joe Roe, Maxim, SoWhy, Casliber, Bradv, Beeblebrox

Oppose:

Recuse:

For the Arbitration Committee, –&#8239;Joe (talk) 18:23, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard

DYK nomination of Lewis (baseball)
Hello! Your submission of Lewis (baseball) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

ANI
I have summarily closed the discussion you recently opened at WP:ANI as I believe your complaint to be without merit. Where possible please pursue other forms of dispute resolution before coming to ANI, which should generally be a last resort. A look at the diffs you linked left me with a strong conviction that you were over-reacting. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:00, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Lewis (baseball)
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:04, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Well done!
Really appreciate it. Therapyisgood (talk) 21:04, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/What's a Nice Girl Like You Doing in a Place Like This?/archive2
I would appreciate your thoughts on this. CAPTAIN MEDUSA  talk  16:50, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Markham's storm petrel
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Markham's storm petrel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 21:20, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Markham's storm petrel
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Edward Thomas Daniell FAC
Hi Therapyisgood, Thanks for your comments on the article, which I've now addressed. Would you mind returning to the comments to say you're happy that I've responded to your suggestions? Thanks. Amitchell125 (talk) 12:34, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Chris Gragg
I am thinking about moving the Chris Gragg article to WP:FAR and posted this section on the talk page. Any feedback you have would be much appreciated. Tonystewart14 (talk) 23:22, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I have nominated Chris Gragg for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Tonystewart14 (talk) 14:22, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Markham's storm petrel
The article Markham's storm petrel you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Markham's storm petrel for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 23:20, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Markham's storm petrel
The article Markham's storm petrel you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Markham's storm petrel for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 05:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Willie Mays
Thanks for your comments on the Willie Mays peer review! I applied your suggestions, and I just nominated it for featured article status, so feel free to comment! Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 11:35, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi! I just nominated Willie Mays for a peer review. During its recent featured article nomination, User:SandyGeorgia suggested it needed more work on the prose and mentioned that such a review could use the help of an experienced baseball editor like yourself. If you have time to take a look at it, your input would be greatly appreciated! Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 13:32, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Sometime in the coming months when you have enough time, could you go through the Mays article and let me know what would need to be fixed for you to support its promotion to FA? The most recent review closed because no one had given any supports; I am thinking that a lot of people just didn't have time to look through such a long article. This way, you can look at it whenever you get a chance, instead of having to do so within a certain amount of time. Let me know! Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 23:01, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Lewis (baseball)
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for March 23, 2021. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/March 23, 2021. Congratulations on your work!—Wehwalt (talk) 20:02, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you today for Lewis (baseball), who "played in one professional baseball game in 1890, and his first name is completely unknown. He's interesting for sure, and showed how the 1890 Buffalo Bisons were doing at the time. Set several records of futility, and was described as a "failure" and "unfortunate" in press at the time. History hasn't been kinder to him."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:11, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Precious
You are recipient no. 2562 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:11, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Anna Wilson (basketball)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Anna Wilson (basketball) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 23:21, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Anna Wilson (basketball)
The article Anna Wilson (basketball) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Anna Wilson (basketball) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 00:41, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Liquid Death
Hello! Your submission of Liquid Death at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 05:43, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Anna Wilson (basketball)
The article Anna Wilson (basketball) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Anna Wilson (basketball) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 23:21, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Liquid Death
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Anna Wilson (basketball)
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Mom Genes
Hello, Therapyisgood,

Thank you for creating Mom Genes.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"This page needs more content and information. Thank you."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 08:15, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Those Wild Wyndhams
Hello, Therapyisgood,

Thank you for creating Those Wild Wyndhams.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"More information about this novel would be helpful. Thank you."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 18:31, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Bunk (book)
Hello, Therapyisgood,

Thank you for creating Bunk (book).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"More information about this book would be helpful. Thank you."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 18:35, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Doom (book)
Hello, Therapyisgood,

Thank you for creating Doom (book).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"A *lot* more information about this book would be helpful."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 18:37, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve The Poisoned City
Hello, Therapyisgood,

Thank you for creating The Poisoned City.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"More information about this book is needed."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 18:39, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:150 Glances of The Beatles.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:150 Glances of The Beatles.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

superhuman strength
You need to actually add references to the reviews, not just imply them.  DGG ( talk ) 00:27, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I shall move it to draft until there is evidence added to show notability  DGG ( talk ) 23:35, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Bullshit. Look at the Bookmarks review. Therapyisgood (talk) 23:59, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve K: A History of Baseball in Ten Pitches
Hello, Therapyisgood,

Thank you for creating K: A History of Baseball in Ten Pitches.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Insufficient references for this book. One review does not meet WP:NBOOK. Thank you."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 08:50, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Tag dropped on NPP, after checking of references. --Whiteguru (talk) 09:02, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Bomber Mafia
Hello! Your submission of The Bomber Mafia at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:29, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Fulfillment (book) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Fulfillment (book), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 01:03, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Read the BookMarks reviews and save us both the time before tagging. Therapyisgood (talk) 03:12, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Fulfillment (book). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. The edit summary at 03:09, 20 June 2021 sat you revert a WP:New page patroller calling them troll which is particularly inappropriate for their function

Fulfillment (book) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Fulfillment (book), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz Read! Talk! 01:29, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * @: Noting the discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers yours and my re-draftification of this article may have been against guidelines. While Therapyisgood's actions to add three additional citations in response to my (possible inappropriate) draftification was I believe an improvement the response to draftification of resulted in my opinion TOOMANYREFS and I would support their removal.  I'd comment, and if too many RL issues this week for a depth debate, the bigger debate is really is less notability and more if the article has been developed sufficiently to be suitable for an encyclopedia.  Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:39, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Big Game: The NFL in Dangerous Times for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Big Game: The NFL in Dangerous Times is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Game: The NFL in Dangerous Times until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – PeeJay 17:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

DYK for The Bomber Mafia
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Featured articles
Hello User talk:Therapyisgood, I saw you kept reverting my good faith edits, and I was hoping you could explain to me the "process" for the Best Featured Actor / Actress in a Play articles. How would the version I added (basically copied from Supporting Actor / Actress articles from Academy Awards, British Academy Film Awards, etc.) get "processed"? Most if not all Awards body articles have the same format as the one I added.The One I Left (talk) 20:15, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve The Ratline
Hello, Therapyisgood,

Thank you for creating The Ratline.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"This article requires more references, such as independent book reviews and book notes. Thank you."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 10:45, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Margyl1905.JPG
Independent from you I had noticed the erroneous Creative Commons license on File:Margyl1905.JPG and File:Margyl1905 (cropped).JPG and it bugs me as well. The correct license would be " ". But this is an error on Commons, not Wikipedia, so reporting it on Main Page/Errors doesn't help. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 21:44, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * this post is about WP:ERRORS report Not sure what I should do about Commons, if anything. The DYK for Jane Margyl has come and gone on the Main Page. I don't know enough about Commons licensing to deal with this.   is indef blocked at Commons, so they can't do anything.  — Maile  (talk) 22:08, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * User:Maile66, that took me down a really long and twirly rabbit hole. Thanks! Also, I don't do things on Commons, for very good reasons, and I have really nothing to do at all with the image, so I'll have to push the "not my job" button, regrettably. Drmies (talk) 01:11, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , in the interest of education I'll explain to you how I arrived at my conclusion: according to the file description the photographer is Nadar. This is confirmed by the signature on File:Margyl1905.JPG. Nadar died in 1910, so per the Copyright law of France his works entered the public domain 70 years later on 1 January 1981. And 1910 is over a 100 years ago. The URAA date for France (on which US copyrights for foreign works were restored) is 1 January 1996. Since the copyright in France had already expired in 1981 no copyright was restored in the US for this photo, hence the "-1996" in "PD-old-100-1996". Even better would actually be " ", but that's just technicalities. Another option would be , but technically we don't have proof the photo was published before 1926 which makes -1996 the safer option in this particular case. If you have copyright questions in the future, feel free to ask.  — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 09:23, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * It's moot for us now. Sharper, no deformation (as File:Margyl1905 (cropped).JPG is a photo of a photo) and better license tags. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 11:36, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * can you take a look at c:File:Mlle Margyl dans Samson et Dalila.jpg? I had uploaded File:Jane Margyl in Samson et Dalila.jpg here on enwiki as the source for File:Jane Margyl in Samson et Dalila (cropped).jpg, not knowing that you had already uploaded the file from Gallica to Commons. I didn't realize at the time that it was possible to get the original from Gallica (didn't see a download button) so I used the image viewer, resulting in an upscaled file. Magog has imported my upload to Commons and overwritten your non-upscaled version. I would recommend reverting File:Mlle Margyl dans Samson et Dalila.jpg to your version. I can't do it myself but as I uploaded the new version I feel at least partially responsible. I'd ask Magog, but that scares me a bit due to the history. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 15:12, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of George Floyd (American football)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article George Floyd (American football) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:01, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of George Floyd (American football)
The article George Floyd (American football) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:George Floyd (American football) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 10:40, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of George Floyd (American football)
The article George Floyd (American football) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:George Floyd (American football) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 12:01, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of George Floyd (American football)
Hello! Your submission of George Floyd (American football) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! firefly ( t · c ) 16:06, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

FAC
I'd be happy to review George Floyd, but obviously I can't do so while your review of the parrot book is open. No rush from my point of view though, it will be at FAC for at least a couple of weeks yet. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  15:29, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
 * could you review it now that the parrot review has closed? Thanks in advance-- Therapyisgood (talk) 21:09, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Bomber Mafia
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Bomber Mafia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:41, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Bomber Mafia
The article The Bomber Mafia you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Bomber Mafia for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:01, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Bomber Mafia
The article The Bomber Mafia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Bomber Mafia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:21, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

DYK for George Floyd (American football)
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

BookMarks
I think it's the standard at enWP that a collection of excerpts of reviews from other places is not a suitable source. You have no way of knowing whether the excerpt from the view is representative., and the reader needs to see from the articles itself where the reviews are coming from. You need to cite the actual published reviews,. I' and others have commented on it before with respect to a number of your articles, and I see the situation has not yet been dealt with, so  perhaps it needs further discussion. .     DGG ( talk ) 04:25, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Lewis (baseball) Featured article review
I have nominated Lewis (baseball) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Sandy Georgia (Talk)  17:39, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Harry Tombs
Hello! Your submission of Harry Tombs at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! lullabying (talk) 17:16, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 11:14, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Charles Allan Marris
M AN d ARAX •  XAЯA b ИA M  01:31, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Charlie Bartson
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Harry Tombs
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Julie Croteau
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Julie Croteau you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 17:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Julie Croteau
The article Julie Croteau you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Julie Croteau for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 22:20, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Genevieve Beacom
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Julie Croteau
The article Julie Croteau you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Julie Croteau for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 16:21, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Gragg
Good catch there! Red Director (talk) 02:15, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Julie Croteau
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 8 March 2022 (UTC) Thank you for your share in IWD! I show two who didn't make it, one from Russia and one from Ukraine. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:13, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:03, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Ed Travis
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Ventilation shutdown
Hello, Therapyisgood,

Thank you for creating Ventilation shutdown.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"This article has insufficient information nor references to satisfy notabilty. See WP:BASIC."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 05:34, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Coffeezilla moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Coffeezilla, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Pbrks (t • c) 15:23, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Coffeezilla has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Coffeezilla. Thanks! – Pbrks (t • c) 15:27, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Coffeezilla
Hello, Therapyisgood. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Coffeezilla, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:48, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Coffeezilla


Hello, Therapyisgood. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Coffeezilla".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:40, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Yesterday's error
Hi! I didn't see it yesterday, but I saw on WP:ERRORS However, Brown lost 3–4 should this be However, Brown lost 4–3? - in case you were wondering, it's actually part of MOS:CUE, that we put the score of who we are talking about first. It's probably not all that interesting to you, but I thought I'd let you know. :)  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:26, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I've looked at the page but can't find where it specifically says that, but I'll take your word for it. Cheers. Therapyisgood (talk) 05:25, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Errors
Hi, I didn't know what your report at Errors meant. I've cleared the whole page; if there is an error, please repost it with a bit more context.  Schwede 66  01:09, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Look at POTD. There's a "see also" header underneath the POTD which states "See also Template:POTD protected/<(/)noinclude>". That was the error. I apologize, I thought that would be clear to anyone looking at it. Therapyisgood (talk) 01:28, 9 December 2022 (UTC)