User talk:There are squirrels chasing in my glass

January 2008
Your recent edit to User:Gilesbennett (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 21:49, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Oxymoron83 21:49, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Snark
I have reverted your edit. Be aware that if you continue to revert back to the version without discussion you will be in violation of the three revert rule. Oh, and thanks for blanking my userpage. Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 21:51, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

You have been from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continued deletion of material. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.

What's up?
What's up, my friend? I see a pattern of good edits followed by page-blanking. Was it just boredom? Please come back and contribute more good edits. They really are appreciated. --Tony Sidaway 21:57, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

June 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:TreasuryTag. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 18:51, 27 June 2010 (UTC)