User talk:Therealelizacat

Survey
Hi Elizacat!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 20:12, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Alamo
Hi. I'm just checking that you are aware of the renewed discussion concerning a proposed merger of Susan Alamo, a subject on which you previously had an opinion.  Timothy Titus Talk To TT  14:47, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

TP/IX moved to Draft:TP/IX
Hi, Greetings. Pls note that your creation of TP/IX  has been moved to  Draft:TP/IX as  no sources and citations as written to remain published. Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs "inline citation" from independent (third party / secondary / tertiary) reliable source (in any language) for verification to gauge the nobility criteria is met. The articles's inline citation is the WP:BURDEN which it is on the person adding the information. Please note official website, records of sport events or individual player records are consider primary source and not independent source, and social network source such as facebook, twitter, instagram, imbd and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as The Guardian, Sydney Morning Herald, CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press). Pls see

1 reliable source - see WP:RS (Note: Wikipedia can NOT be the source - see WP:CIRCULAR) 2 primary vs secondary vs tiartiary source - see WP:WPNOTRS 3 verification - see WP:V 4 notability - see WP:N

Citing source from web - Do not copy and past the URL address and paste into the body text, but click "cite" on menu page and fill in the info as per the Template: cite web below 5 citing source - see WP:Citing sources and WP:Tutorial/Citing sources 6 citing from internet source - see WP:CITEWEB and its template -see Template: cite web

Once you have provided inline citations, kindly ping me at my talk page or at your talk page by typing (please remove "nowiki" upon replying) for me to review the page to get it publish. For more editing help, you could send your question to the friendly and helpful volunteers at the Teahouse. Lastly, I strongly encourage you to visit WP:The Wikipedia Adventure for there are some short and fun exercises on neutrality, verifiability, collaboration, research and sourcing. Thank you and let me know if you need further assistance.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 00:56, 4 April 2018 (UTC)