User talk:Therealslimwikieditor

Your submission at Articles for creation: UseVerb (May 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UseVerb and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:UseVerb Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pythoncoder&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:UseVerb reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— python coder (talk &#124; contribs) 04:20, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:UseVerb


A tag has been placed on Draft:UseVerb, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. SeanTVT (talk) 15:58, 7 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @SeanTVT @YesI'mOnFire
 * My page Draft:UseVerb was deleted under section G11. I'll re-review what I wrote, and try to make it less promotional. I felt I spoke with a fairly neutral tone. A lot of the information was gathered from website and social pages, perhaps this carried through into my writing.
 * As the page has been deleted now, do I start a new page? I cannot make any edits to the original?
 * Do you have any recommendations for how I can avoid being marked with the G11 again?
 * Thanks! Therealslimwikieditor (talk) 07:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: UseVerb (June 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fancy Refrigerator was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UseVerb and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:UseVerb Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fancy_Refrigerator&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:UseVerb reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 01:26, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:UseVerb


A tag has been placed on Draft:UseVerb, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 01:27, 28 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @Fancy Refrigerator thank you for your quick review of this.
 * I'm not sure how I can write it any less promotional? I have stated the functionality of the product and features, but do not make any comments about it being superior or producing any certain results. It is very neutral. I am also not affiliated with the subject.
 * I have referred to how other similar pages have been written, such as LinkedIn and HubSpot and have followed same structure and tone of voice?
 * Thank you for your assistance. Therealslimwikieditor (talk) 05:06, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023


Hello, Therealslimwikieditor. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. The page Draft:UseVerb has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not an outlet for promotion, advocacy, or advertising.

Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.

Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.

Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are  unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. '''That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. ''' Please see this page on citing sources and Common sourcing mistakes (notability). This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE and on IRC chat, as well as WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

New article creation can be difficult and frustrating. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @Deepfriedokra thank you for your quick review of this.
 * I'm not sure how I can write it any less promotional? I have stated the functionality of the product and features, but do not make any comments about it being superior or producing any certain results. It is very neutral. I am also not affiliated with the subject.
 * I have referred to how other similar pages have been written, such as LinkedIn and HubSpot and have followed same structure and tone of voice?
 * Thank you for your assistance. Therealslimwikieditor (talk) 05:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Please ask for help by following the Teahouse link above. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:53, 28 June 2023 (UTC)