User talk:Thereisnowhy

Re:Kisuke Urahara
This is where his name order is discussed. The title, just in case you don't see it, is "Names, first or last?". Peace,  The Hippie  22:23, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, okay. I didn't know that. Well, I really don't know that much about Kisuke's initial release, blah blah blah. If someone still reverts that because they disagree, bring it up on the talk page. And you're welcome; I give a welcome out to anyone who has nothing on their talk page. Peace,  The Hippie  22:48, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The neutral template is only used when an article presents a point of view. That we do not accept your opinion of a situation being abnormal is not a point of view. It's your original research being denied. There's nothing uncommon about a bankai functioning differently than the shikai. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 22:26, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * We is the several editors who reverted you. Regardless of what you make think, every seemingly interesting (to you) fact does not need to be included. Just because something is true doesn't mean it's important. Consensus is against you. Just because Urahara could train Ichigo with one form, doesn't mean the other would be unusual in not doing so. Maybe it boils his opponent's blood, breathes poison, turns Urahara into a chibi? That one and the other don't match up is not a concern. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 02:02, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Take it to Talk:Kisuke Urahara if you want to accomplish something, becuase edit warring will not accomplish anything. — Someguy0830 (T | C)
 * Sockpuppetry accusations now? For shame. Anyone can look at the contributions of those reverting you and see we're separate people, plus there's three, not two. Just because you notice something doesn't mean it's important. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 02:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)