User talk:Theroadislong/archives/Archive 1

George Roland Parvin
Hi

I am trying to create a new page for a former family member, I have noticed its showing as a living person, can this be edited please as he is no longer with us. Also, please let me know what I can do to verify this new page?

Thanks

Daniel Parvin —Preceding unsigned comment added by DanParvin (talk • contribs) 23:04, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Rhodes Amplification
Hello George,

I realized after starting my Rhodes Amplification page I was engaged in a Wikipedia conflict of interest. I moved my edits to my user space which I was under the impression was used as a temporary location for page creation. I feel I am maintaining a neutral tone and not using Wikipedia as a promotional tool for my company -- I am attempting to create a page similar to other amplifier companies which simply states information regarding the products offered and who uses them in addition to company history and future.

If you feel I am still in violation please advise how I can do this properly.

Best Regards, --Kylerhodes (talk) 22:17, 5 August 2009 (UTC)


 * you should use a sandbox.  Teapot  george Talk  22:19, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

lymphoma.org links
Hello, We are from the Lymphoma Research Foundation. Is there any reason why you are removing links from wikipedia that link to our website lymphoma.org? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.10.138.114 (talk) 15:52, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a promotional tool for your organisation nor is it a directory of mere links. You have a potential conflict of interest too.  Teapot  george Talk  20:58, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

SPA and COI
Hi George

I am new to wiki.- am slow and methodical in my editing, hence my many attempts at my first project (you cited 120 edits). I wish my editing skills were better, but they are not, and I am still learning. I understood that I was welcome to edit the article to address the concerns for which it was nominated for deletion - which I tried to. It took me a long time as you can see, but I did not know that counted against me or that it was to be seen as 'bad behaviour'.

Vaishal (talk) 18:07, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed Ceramic Art portal
I have just joined WikiProject Arts and I'm thinking about creating a Ceramic Art portal. There are a lot of ceramic articles and this might be a way of bringing editors together and highlighting work that needs to be done (e.g. adding material on the USA to Studio pottery). However, I don't know how to create a portal and wondered if you, as an editor with similar interests to me, had any thoughts about it. Marshall46 (talk) 16:33, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

The instructions are here...I may have a go later this evening unless you beat me to it? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Portal/Instructions Teapotgeorge (talk) 17:44, 18 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Good work! I'll try to add to it when I have more time. Marshall46 (talk) 21:22, 18 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Excellent start. I'm busy for the next week so I won't be doing anything that requires much thought.  Is the picture of the Venus of Dolní Věstonice not a hostage to fortune?! Marshall46 (talk) 20:20, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Possibly!! Teapotgeorge (talk) 20:34, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Leach Pottery
You were right to edit the addition made to this page by Mark Anselm: it is unscourced, POV and marketing copy. I am going to edit his revert and put a note on the discussion page. Marshall46 18:38, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Pottery Makers category
Plainly, the elimination of named Potters from the External Links was wrong.

That writer has a different perspective as to which potters are not notable.

I suggest that the individual potteries be put into a different category, thereby not 'cluttering' the internal links (See alsos), while maintaining these. You may not realize, for example, the import of Pewabic Pottery -- but it is of significance to the Arrts and Crafts movement, and at least to much of the Midwestern U.S. Y

our deletion was at the very least parochial and ill-advised. Your getting rid of the new category and the listing orphaned a lot of serious articles on the subject. I was trying to work within the framework of letting the "External Links" be shortened and simplified.

7&amp;6=thirteen 20:10, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Michael Cardew
Sorry, 'fraid I'm lost a bit on ISBN links, too; I tried everything I could think of, but it doesn't seem to work. Wish I could be of more help, sorry. --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 22:02, 26 December 2006 (UTC)


 * See ISBN, it's automatically converted into links, no brackets required. Femto 14:48, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the help with the ISBN and the general tidying. I know that Seth Cardew describes him as such but not at all sure that the term "ceramic stylist" is appropriate for Michael Cardew? sounds like a hairdresser! Teapotgeorge 15:02, 27 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Change as you see fit. I only added it because the opening sentence of an article needs to set the general context. Femto 16:19, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

KGVFs
Great to have you aboard. I solved it but you beat me to it. This can become addictive! Fiddle Faddle 13:57, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Errr I don't think I solved it? Teapotgeorge 14:02, 8 January 2007 (UTC)


 * It seems not. Ah well.  I'll have a look a bit later.  I've been painting a ceiling and my mind is not in Wikipedia :)  Fiddle Faddle 17:36, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * It could be simple. The OS Grid ref is incomplete (I think).  two letters and 6 digits are required :).  Complete that and it should go through —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Timtrent (talk • contribs) 17:39, 8 January 2007 (UTC).
 * This is wonderful stuff. I haven't checked, but can you make sure you add a line to each place as well, stating that they have a KGVF and wikilinking the list you are workin on?  There is an example in pretty much any of the other lists, of in the Wikiproject.  :)  Fiddle Faddle 22:54, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 18:33, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Camborne School of Mines and stuff
Hi, no big deal but it is considered a trifle rude to remove another editors contribution on a talkpage. Even if the comment is obsolete, as mine admittedly was, it should have been kept. LessHeard vanU 21:58, 16 January 2007 (UTC) Sincere apologies it was an accident not intentional... I have re-added your comment ...very sorry!! Teapotgeorge 10:43, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem. You appear to be new(ish) here, and we all make mistakes. Thanks for the revert. LessHeard vanU 13:48, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Liskeard
Thanks for the message. The general text was okay but the spamlink obviously is not permitted on Wikipedia. I have accordingly edited the text. Richard Harvey 11:32, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Commercial link on McCoy Pottery
Hi Teapotgeorge. With reference to comments a few weeks back you may be interested to read, and possibly comment, about the validity of the external link over at Talk:McCoy (pottery) ThanxTheriac 17:19, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Saint Mabena
Looks great to me. Thank you very much. :) John Carter 14:14, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Poll at List of notable converts to Christianity
Hello Teapotgeorge. I noticed that you have not cast a vote to break the tie in the latest attempt to reach consensus at List of notable converts to Christianity. I encourage you to do so here. Thank you. Nick Graves 19:17, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom
I have submitted a report on User:Bus stop on the ArbCom page here. As an individual who was involved in this debate, your participation would be appreciated. Thanks. Drumpler 17:32, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Bus stop
I think for now it'd just be wise to ignore Bus stop's page. It doesn't really do any good for anyone, as he is blocked from disruptive editing, and it might just continue to entrench him in his belief that his actions are justifiable. Drumpler 21:11, 1 July 2007 (UTC) OK Teapotgeorge 21:41, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

re Stonehenge
Hi, about your query, as the article on that subject says, the voting, purpose and significance of the competition is disputed. I'd agree that in itself isn't a fatal objection, but it doesn't really seem to belong in the article, which is about the monument, and the recent history is about what affects it directly, i.e. the road scheme, UNESCO status, preservation work, etc. The fact it has appeared on a poll of this sort in some capacity is rather superfluous to an already long and detailed article. It was for these reasons that the article was split up. Stonehenge in popular culture would be a more appropriate place for this sort of comment, but I'm hesitant to, again owing to the fact there seems to be some sort of dispute over the competition. Once that was settled, I'd be more happy to see it in some way on one of the spin off articles. I don't seem to be alone in this, someone else seems to have added a reference to this earlier, and was reverted. Hope that explains my thinking. Benea 17:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Reversion
Please give an explanation for your reversion of my edits on Atheism. Thank you. selfworm Talk ) 22:21, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Sorry I didn't really check out the links properly, I initially thought they were inappropriate but on second thoughts they are quite relevant...feel free to re -add them. Teapotgeorge 10:51, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Pottery
Hi. Pottery is a term used to describe clay based ceramics. It is not connected with the form of the object. Ceramics is a very large group of materials, many of which did not conatin any clay - for example silicon carbide and boron nitride. If pottery is just specific to vessels consider the case of a ball of clay: This doesn't make sense! It can not be sensible to suggest that A has more connection with a missle nose cone (high tech cermaics which had no clay) than with B. Also pottery as a clay based ceramic is the recognised terminology with the industry (for UK think "The Potteries" in Stoke-on-Trent) Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.153.70.31 (talk) 17:07, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
 * A] Fire it as a ball. It is not a container so your defintion does not make it pottery.
 * B] Force your finger into it to make a hole, and then fire it. According to your defintion it does becomes pottery.

Thank you for your comments, I am a potter so am fully aware of the various terms. Consensus in the past has been that Ceramic is the preferred term for the Venus figurine.Teapotgeorge 17:17, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi. The article should make some mention of pottery. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.153.70.31 (talk) 17:27, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Umm?
Hmm, I think you might have gotten confused! You placed an Afd comment on my talk page, I think you were looking for Articles for deletion/Lila Turjanski-Villard  ARended Winter 13:32, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Creation science‎
Rather than blindly reverting, it would help if you actually read the source, and corrected the spelling error. cheers.  – ornis ⚙ 09:40, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry you've lost me! I reverted because it made no sense, then I changed the spelling so it did make sense...you reverted it to the incorrect spelling and then changed the spelling again yourself???Teapotgeorge 10:14, 11 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Eh? No, you reverted twice[], from "could not published[sic]" to "did not publish". Fair enough on the surface, except the source is specifically saying "cannot" not just "did not". I revert to the misspelled version ( admittedly because I didn't notice it was misspelled ) then corrected the error. Check the history, sorry about the finger-wagging, I guess this was just a misunderstanding.  – ornis ⚙ 10:53, 11 October 2007 (UTC)


 * ARGH!!! I just checked the history again... don't I feel the fool, quite right, sorry about that, I saw you revert hrafn twice, and obviously didn't look closely enough... go on slap me, I deserve it...  – ornis ⚙ 10:57, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm not the violent type so... no slapping! I've made similar mistakes myself! All good wishes Teapotgeorge 11:20, 11 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Lucky for me! But rest assured, at this very moment, I am fetching the sack-clothe tunic from my wardrobe, and covering my face in ashes...;)  – ornis ⚙ 11:28, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Pewabic Pottery
Dear Teapot:

That you would eliminate Pewabic Pottery from the list of studio potters is bizarre. Putting aside whether you are or I am "parochial' (I apologize for saying that; you might be right that I am), but Arts and Crafts] (which was international, not just North American) and [[Pewabic Pottery were and are important. I know you are from Columbia, but you need to not put on your censorship mode.

You did the same stuff in Pottery. I have the same problem here.

I would like to collegially work this out. I don't mean to have a war over this, and I would like you to voluntarily reconsider.

7&amp;6=thirteen 13:47, 16 November 2007 (UTC) Stan

It is a list of individual "Studio Potters" I don't see how Pewabic Pottery qualifies? Teapotgeorge 14:13, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Hello George:
I'm over here to chat about your removal of the Notable Pottery makers (should really be ( opinion) Notable pottery makers) from the Pottery article. This seems to me to be a pretty useful section. However I am reluctant to just plop it back if you are just going to axe it again and then I can. . . ..... well you know how it goes. So, what is your objection again? Carptrash (talk) 05:35, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

I have no objection to a "notable" potters list but not an "obscure" potters list, designed to get people's personal favourites in. Plop it back if you wish. Teapotgeorge (talk) 05:58, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Re:Ashley West
Are you referring to the artist Ashley West. He currently teaches at QE Boys school in barnet. I attend the school and he used to teach me art. DavidJJJ (talk) 22:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC) PS His website is www.ashleywest.co.uk

Noah's Ark
Just a note about the rollbacks - User:HisTruthsetsfree is pretty obviously a total newbie, so, you know, his contribution might be out of place, but this is the first article he's edited, so that's probably to be expected. Help him out if you get a chance. Adam Cuerden talk 05:16, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Penwith Wikiproject & Cornwall Wikiproject
Hi, I see you are a member of the Cornwall Wikiproject. A proposal has been made to merge the Penwith Wikiproject into it. You can join in the debate here. Best wishes, DuncanHill (talk) 12:20, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Emma Bossons
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Emma Bossons, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 00:44, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Emma Bossons
An editor has nominated Emma Bossons, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks - next stop featured article status!Mammal4 (talk) 08:49, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Bono
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. 82.37.53.242 (talk) 22:25, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

I removed an innappropriate template that you added for no good reason?. I suggest you take it to the talk page. Teapotgeorge (talk) 22:37, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Craft Potters’ Association
I have started a discussion about the recent changes. You may wish to comment before I edit again. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.147.253.151 (talk) 19:29, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi - I've started another thread on the same discussion page. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.147.253.151 (talk) 21:19, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Language notice
In a recent edit, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to the other, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They in turn should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any queries about all this, you can ask me on my talk page or you can visit the help desk. Groupthink (talk) 21:24, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

I apologise I thought I was reverting to the original spelling? Teapotgeorge (talk) 22:30, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Your POV Pushing on the Ficus and Jacob Sheep papes
In reference to your recent vandalism of the Ficus and Jacob (sheep) pages http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ficus&diff=201114139&oldid=201113733 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jacob_%28sheep%29&diff=201115683&oldid=201113161

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits.

An encyclopedia article is no place for creationist propaganda. Teapotgeorge (talk) 19:49, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Edit to Intellegent Design
Please do not arbitrarily delete positive contributions to articles. Feel free to disagree or even discuss - but do not automatically delete what you find. This is currently a very polarized article which has room to state some common ground. Other people may have legitimate input to articles. Rlsheehan (talk) 21:11, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

If you really want references, proper protocol is to tag an item as "citation needed". I will replace the material with a citation. Rlsheehan (talk) 23:27, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Different contributer: IP 86.159.233.95 Apologies to the original poster and yourself for using this post but I am new to this and cannot add a new item. I was wondering what the protocol was and why you feel it necessary to delete most if not all of my posts? Examples: New Eric Liddell sporting biography link deleted - featured on BBC sport, Daily telegraph, independent etc - not relevant? Sebastian Coe wrote the foreward - not relevant on his page? On the Lady Jane Gray page - not relevant to add that a new biography was written? On the Martyn Lloyd Jones page - not relevant to add a new title on his contribution to twentieth century church life(supported and contributed to by multiple Martyn Lloyd Jones organisations) - Not relevant John Bunyan - A new biography - not relevant? Death and Afterlife - 'Where do we go from here?' - Already written about in almost every major Christian journal - not relevant? Atheism and Richard Dawkins - The book 'Does God believe in Atheists' was award winning Christian book of the year in 2001 and cites RD. Not relevant to the debate?

Yes I am linked to a Christian publisher but I am only adding relevant links. Almost every page has relevant links to titles and ISBN numbers, I am doing nothing special here. Please advise what I am doing wrong. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Woolly6 (talk • contribs) 09:14, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Helligan in St Mabyn parish
Thanks for correcting my foolish error. Would it be possible to have an article on Helligan (St Mabyn)? Google is no help! It looks lovely from the map (Cornwall interactive). Vernon White '''. . . Talk''' 19:58, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

I'll see if I can find any details. Teapotgeorge (talk) 20:05, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Ashley West
Unhelpful to whom? user:SE7User_talk:SE7/Special:Contributions/SE7 19:41, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:50, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Terry Ananny
Yeah, this has been going on for a while. I think it's time to take it to a COI review. I've just been reluctant to wade into that. When I get some free time, I'll begin the process. freshacconci</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">speak</FONT><FONT COLOR="#00FF00">to</FONT><FONT COLOR="#0000FF">me</FONT> 01:43, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Turin Shroud - "alleged" resurrection
Hi! As you suggested, I've started a talk section on the use of "alleged" here, looking forward to your contribution to it. -- Timberframe (talk) 15:54, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

TPT
No need to apologise, mate. I've done the same thing before now. In this case it was a particularly easy mistake to make, given that the TV programme and the film have such similar names. To be honest, I should have checked before I labelled your edit as vandalism. -- JediLofty UserTalk 10:57, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Michael Cardew
teapot george - I'm learning whilst trying to make constructive additions regards portrait heads made by a suitably eminent sculptor. I'd be grateful for advice re what you would feel is necessary to avoid the list spam I seen to have started....

Nancy also warned/advised me.. have questioned her too.

If Michael Cardew sat for a sculptor then surely it is contributive in cultural terms, although in this case the terracotta is not in a national collection (yet). Others are in national and international collections. If editorial is added based on the sitting, its time and place (and perhaps the iamge uploaded,) will this suffice? thanksCazimir (talk) 16:09, 16 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I would suggest the fact that a sculptor modelled a portrait head, which is in the artists own collection, isn't really a notable event in Michael Cardew's life? It would be fine to mention it in the artists article though. Teapotgeorge (talk) 18:24, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Henry Moore at WP:FAR
You are one of the leading editors of Henry Moore. His article has been nomninated at Featured article review/Henry Moore.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 21:43, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I apologize for not using the official notification before. Henry Moore has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 05:16, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Your recent revert
Please remove. Your action is interrupting a clean up and not very respectful. If you wish to claim that the person in question is not notable, please process it through AfD as such. Otherwise, notability is established by his world cat publication history as per WP:PROF. Such a tag is not acceptable on articles. Ottava Rima (talk) 23:24, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * In case you were wondering, this is also readily available. The Conflict of Interest will be handled shortly, as the professor in question now knows better. I'm going to rework some aspects of the article, as I specialize in professor and politicians who have come to their own Wikipedia pages. I hope you don't mind, and I hope you understand where I am coming from. Ottava Rima (talk) 23:32, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Karla Poewe
Dear George:

You and the user identified as "Hrafn" correctly pointed out that I had created a page for my wife "Karla Poewe" that involved a conflict of interest, lacked appropriate citations, and was not "neutral." Subsequently, I pleaded guilty to all three charges on the grounds that I had not read Wikipeadia rules. Nevertheless, I had acted "in the spirit of Wikipeadia" because I was trying to be provide information about a scholar who is notable enough to be included in the "Canadian Who's Who" and has published a number of significant books and articles that are the subject of lively academic debates.

After my posts and apologies on this issue at least three other people edited the page to remove and rework the offending passages. If you now check the history you will see that I have nothing to do with the article and that other people have taken it over. You will also see that with the exception of Karla's list of publications all the references are to independent, peer reviewed, academic sources.

May I suggest that in the spirit of collaboration you change the reference to her list of publications by adding the following which is from a verifiable website, that of the Center for Military and Strategic Studies at the University of Calgary, and not her own webpage. The URL is: http://cmss.ucalgary.ca/fellows/poewe

May I also suggest that you then check all the edits to confirm that these were made by third parties and that there is no longer a conflict of interest. The perhaps you will kindly remove the Template which as the last editor noted was no longer applicable. Thank you. Irving Hexham (talk) 14:13, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Gunnn/Gunn
Hi thanks for the message - every major Dylan biographer, Echo Helstrom and Bonnie Beecher say "Gunn" Best, 650 Norton (1951) (talk) 15:54, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

West The Sculptor
He does sculpting for special occasions, such as bar mitzvahs, and has provided several sculptures around the school he works at user:SE7User_talk:SE7/Special:Contributions/SE7 15:37, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Mediation request for NZ inclusion on GDS' article
(you only edited once on the topic, here, but I notify you anyways in case you are interested on the topic and want to leave your opinion)In order to solve the revert war on GDS article over the inclusion of the banning from New Zealand, I have opened a request for formal mediation at Requests for mediation/Giovanni Di Stefano. Please participate on the discussion. --Enric Naval (talk) 01:37, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Michael Cardew
You have re-added Michael Cardew as an alumni of The Central.. I reverted because there was no evidence for this. Can you point me to a reference and I will add the detail to his own article too. Thank you.  Teapot  george <sup style="color:blue;">Talk  12:25, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The re-ad was not intentional, - I was rearranging the overall article and his name must have been included when I was referencing the history log for lost information I wanted to re-ad, my apologies. Regarding Cardew, my only source is from the official website of Central Saint Martins that lists him (or someone with a similar name and craft) on their alumni list (http://www.csm.arts.ac.uk/csm_alumni_who_16487.htm). I'm assuming the source to be true considering it's the official website of the college and I'd see no reason for them to falsely claim otherwise for one individual. Furthermore, referencing over the prospectuses, he features on the alumni list at the back as well. Obviously a secondary source would be ideal, - although I suspect it'll be difficult to find that online since he may have only studied (or possibly taught) at the college briefly... Either way, I'll leave it up to you. I've briefly scanned through Google with his name and the college attached and there's a few indications (although not concrete) of his connection with the college but not solid enough. Entangle (talk) 12:48, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Wikiquette alerts
I've filed a report about Firefly322 on the Wikiquette alerts page, and it mentions your intervention (for which I thank you). Yours, Verbal   chat  15:14, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

NowCommons: Image:Tara palmer tomkinson.jpg
Image:Tara palmer tomkinson.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Tara Palmer-Tomkinson.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:18, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Clarice Cliff activity
I hope my actions are roughly what you were seeking. If I missed anything obvious do let me know. Regards -- Herby talk thyme 13:34, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Now semi protected for a bit & on my watchlist. I'll probably block the IP for a bit too.  Regards -- Herby  talk thyme 07:02, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll work out my thoughts in the next few hours - another block seems sadly inevitable. Thanks -- Herby  talk thyme 07:49, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi - do you want to continue a discussion you started regarding links on that page in general? Regards -- Herby  talk thyme 07:14, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Hello TG. Thank you for changing 'done ' to 'made'! I've worked and lived in New Zealand and America and sadly it has slighty tainted my 'proper' English! All observations greatly appreciated. Thanks -- Len    19:16, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protection from spammers
As per your request, List of Canadian artists has been semi-protected for a fortnight. Thanks for your help in battling vandalism and spammers! --Kralizec! (talk) 22:59, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

prepositions
Ugh, I should have paid more attention during my language school classes >.< --Enric Naval (talk) 19:35, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Why do you say that. Make teapot prove his claim. "In the year 2008..."  does not translate into "On the year 2008..."  "In the United Kingdom..." does not translate into "On the United Kingdom...."  Hag2 (talk) 19:50, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Dylan FAR
Teapotgeorge, Thanks for your contributions & vandal patrolling on Bob Dylan. Maskell suggests it is time to start voting at Dylan FAR. Mick gold (talk) 21:55, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

St Mabyn church
Hi, nice article - but the coordinates end up out at sea! DuncanHill (talk) 22:44, 23 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Ohhh dear! I took them from the St Mabyn page which I also worked out [incorrectly!!]

Sorry I'll have another look!  Teapot  george <sup style="color:blue;">Talk  22:51, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, I think I've got it! DuncanHill (talk) 23:16, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Duncan...  Teapot  george <sup style="color:blue;">Talk  23:56, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem. DuncanHill (talk) 23:59, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

That page
Link is now blacklisted - might make things quieter! Regards -- Herby talk thyme 16:39, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

RFC at Talk:Noah's Ark
Since you've contributed to the recent discussion at Talk:Noah's Ark, this is just a courtesy note to let you know a RFC has been filed here. Thanks, Ben (talk) 22:38, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia and Illuminati, what is the connection?
Hi George, Is there any connection between Wikipedia and Illuminati? I am a member of a tribe in Africa, please pardon my ignorance. I am learning fast though. I've come to realize that most of the things I've been thinking about are already covered by Westerners. I am still coping with that, given that back here I am a lone-explorer, everyone is either Christian or Muslim. I got your message. I will do my best to stick to the rules. --Kaosa (talk) 17:04, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Photograph captions (Cornwall articles)
Hi, George, many thanks for pointing me to the help on captions. I haven't been uploading images to WP for very long - praps I should've looked for guidance myself before I started bunging in piccies! I shall go back over the photos I've uploaded in the light of the advice - for a start, I've not been adding alt tags (though I'm usually assiduous in adding them to tags in HTML).

Thank you very much indeed for your kind words on my contribs to WP:Cornwall - very much appreciated. My mission, should I choose to accept it, is to destroy the forces of evil ...er, blue every redlink and double-check every coord in List of places in Cornwall. So far, I've got to a third of the way through 'B'...

Again, thanks for your encouraging comments and for the useful steer. Season's jollity an' all that, Andy F (talk) 21:36, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

PS I spotted the your 'Firefox' UBX and nicked it.


 * Bodbrane We got into an edit conflict just now! I too was fleshing out that article. I'll go and add my extra bits now then you can see what you think. Warm good wishes, Andy F (talk) 23:50, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Pvisi edit of KEMP Technologies
Hi George, I apologize for the removal of the tags as this was unintentional. Are you able to repost the content that I included on the page? I feel that it has helped to somewhat expand upon the article and avoid the "advertising" vibe the page gives off. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pvisi111 (talk • contribs) 17:10, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Svend Bayer
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Svend Bayer, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Not notable

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Johnhousefriday (talk) 14:44, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Sakshama
please unprotect the page Sakshama, when wikipedia is having articles for techfest, techniche and other technical fetivals. then why not a article for sakshama, a technical festival which was started from a small town of india in the year 2007 and now it is going to celebrate it's third version and it has been said as no #1 technical festival of north india. so i want to write a page for it please unprotect it. you can find more at http://sakshama.org or you can find the same communities on orkut and other social web Aashish K Mahaswary (talk) 15:59, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * You can ignore this; I have pointed the user to WP:RFPU/WP:DRV. He didn't know how to reach an admin and so left talk messages for a page-full of recent changes editors. Stifle (talk) 16:05, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

why revert edit to Adrienne Kennedy?
Hi -- I'm wondering why you reverted this "external link" addition to Adrienne Kennedy:
 * Interviewed by Suzan-Lori Parks for BOMB Magazine

I don't have a strongly developed sense of what is or is not appropriate for external links, but I thought this was a pretty richly informative interview, with some autobiographical detail as well as relevance to the unfolding of Kennedy's career. If there's something wrong with it, would you let me know? (It was not my edit, but it seemed okay to me, and I'm trying to develop a clearer sense of what is and is not appropriate content for external links.)

Thanks! Kenllama/ (talk) 14:12, 8 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the explanation. One sensible approach here might be for me to plunder the interview for useful data, write it into the article, and add the interview as a reference rather than as an external link. The user in question may be spamming, but in this case it might be kind of useful spam. Thank you =) Kenllama/ (talk) 18:39, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Gino Cavicchioli
Just to let you know that I've given the IP a level 4 warning for removing the COI template. I would consider a 24-hour block appropriate if it is removed again; feel free to message me should that happen. Stifle 14:27, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Facts in Creation Science
When reverting my change from "facts" to "axioms" you wrote "they may be changing but they are still facts!"

But most people seeing the word "fact" would take the dictionary definition "thing certainly known to have occurred or be true" (which definitely couldn't change) rather than the definition "thing assumed as basis for inference" which is roughly what axiom means (both occur in the Concise Oxford Dictionary under "fact").

Note that further down the article Creation Science says that a scientific theory must be "correctable and dynamic (changing to fit with newly discovered data)". This is not what a fact is in non-technical terms. An ordinary person should not have to read the article Evolution_as_theory_and_fact in order to understand the reasoning behind the apparentl inflammatory first sentence of the article Creation Science.

Why make an encyclopaedia article unnecessarily controversial when it could be merely a statement of facts? ;-) --PeterR (talk) 15:45, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Wally Findlay Galleries
✅, taken care of. –Juliancolton <sup style="color:#666660;">Tropical <sup style="color:#666660;">Cyclone  22:06, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Bill robb
Given your recent interest in his editing, you might find his self-description in [this edit (one of his very first on wikipedia) to be edifying. <span style="font-family:Antiqua, serif;">[[User:Hrafn|Hrafn]]TalkStalk(P) 05:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Modest isn't he!!!  Teapot  george <sup style="color:blue;">Talk  11:54, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Svend Bayer
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Svend Bayer, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Not notable

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Johnhousefriday (talk) 14:44, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Editing of Radio Tales Pages
Please discontinue the deletion of the audioVille links and information from the Radio Tales pages. The links were for the express purpose of leading article readers to a source of streaming audio for the Radio Tales series. AudioVille is the one and only source for such streaming audio, which is not available for download anywhere else. This content is pertinent, and significantly enhances the reader's appreciation for and understanding of the content of the article. Therefore, it does not qualify as spam and should be included in the article. The deletion of this content was hasty and ill-informed, and should not be continued. Soundout (talk) 22:54, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Neal Turner Article
I agree the article probably should not be in an encyclopedia...this comment on my talk page seems more than a little crazy: ... Modernist (talk) 13:40, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Ursula Mommens
Hi. I just wanted to say sorry. I hid more text than I meant to. I only wanted to hide the last paragraph (with a notation regarding her centenarian status, if you check) and if she was still actively working in her 101st year, which is what the last paragraph indicates. I did it sloppily. Thanks for fixing. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 18:21, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi
Kindly remove the speedy deletion tag from Sahar Sarid as he is a noted American internet tycoon. Perhaps you have failed to observe that relible references have already been added. Thanks Jon Ascton   (talk)  11:55, 12 March 2009 (UTC)


 * There was one blog reference when I added the tag, blogs are not considered suitable references. You have added the hang on tag so if he is notable it won't be deleted. Regards.  Teapot  george <sup style="color:blue;">Talk  12:10, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Rosalind Wiseman
I didn't mean to be impolite, but I just reverted your recent edit to this article, as the subject's wishes are generally irrelevant except in a BLP situation. Is there a message somewhere I'm not aware of? The subject or her agents have been pretty heavily entangled in this article's history, and I'm getting a bit paranoid. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  18:55, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * That's fine... I just read on the agents? talk page that she no longer had the company and as it wasn't referenced anyway it seemed safer to delete it. The whole article should probably go really.  Teapot  george <sup style="color:blue;">Talk  19:32, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Scriptural reasoning again
Hi Teapotgeorge,

Things have calmed down over at Scriptural reasoning, since your last visit. I think we now have a version that is (a) properly referenced, with multiple third-party reliable citations, and (b) where involved parties on the talk page have agreed that it is NPOV, and that COI issues have therefore been appropriately resolved - and that includes people who represent different sides in the recent dispute. I wonder whether, as a neutral observer, you might be willing to have a quick glance at the current version of the page, and at the most recent discussion at the bottom of the talk page, and (if you are happy with what you see, obviously) remove the NPOV, COI and reference flags on the article?

--mahigton (talk) 20:02, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
- Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 13:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.199.209.162 (talk) 20:09, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism warning
Hi, You warned User_talk:Pola_cola for their article which was CSD'd, but you didn't place the tag. Please take care to either tag it, then warn it, or not warn when another user has tagged. You Edit conficted me trying to warn him :) Cheers &mdash; Deon555<b style="color:purple;">talk</b><sub style="color:brown;">I'm BACK!  14:32, 1 April 2009 (UTC)


 * My apologies.  Teapot  george <sup style="color:blue;">Talk  14:33, 1 April 2009 (UTC)


 * No worries :) &mdash; Deon555<b style="color:purple;">talk</b><sub style="color:brown;">I'm BACK!  14:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Double Standard
Hi Teapot George,

I respect your decision to remove a link that I added for a non-commercial website called Sea Glass Artists & Sea Glass Collectors to the Sea Glass and Sea Pottery page. If it was added inappropriately I apologize. I would like to ask you why the double standard? A site called Sea Glass Lovers also has a link here. If links to both of these sites can not remain here then neither should remain here. I respect the rules of this board but I am concerned about this abusive double standard.

Thanks,

Lisl Armstrong —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seaglassmermaid (talk • contribs) 15:58, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Double Standard
Hi Teapot George,

I respect your decision to remove a link that I added for a non-commercial website called Sea Glass Artists & Sea Glass Collectors to the Sea Glass and Sea Pottery page. If it was added inappropriately I apologize. I would like to ask you why the double standard? A site called Sea Glass Lovers also has a link here. If links to both of these sites can not remain here then neither should remain here. I respect the rules of this board but I am concerned about this abusive double standard.

Thanks,

Lisl ArmstrongSeaglassmermaid (talk) 16:20, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Please don't accuse me of double standards...someone else has already removed the offending link, I would have, had I noticed it.  Teapot  george <sup style="color:blue;">Talk  17:30, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Please Accept My Apology
Hi,

Please forgive my earlier messages to you. The history reveals what was happening and you were not carrying on with a double standard. I hope you will continue to keep an eye on the sea glass page.

Thanks,

Lisl Armstrong Seaglassmermaid (talk) 17:36, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Problem with St Mabyn Church
This should be sorted out now: though it is not an easy thing to work with the use of one of the Cite Web templates produces more durable linkage. As many editors are using simpler systems there is a mixture within the Cornwall articles which does no harm at all. WP:Cite web shows what it is all about: if the editor has visited the source it needs |accessdate=2009-04-06 (for example).Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 18:06, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Seahouses Festival
Just to note that I removed your speedy tag from this page, and replaced it with {advert}, as I disagree that it's G11 and requires a fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic. If you stand by your position, please raise it to AFD for discussion. Thanks :) ShakingSpirit <sup style="color:#000000;">talk  12:23, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

removal
Why do you insist on removing my site from the banksy external links page? The site is well respected. Is on page 1 of google for banksy, is page ranking of 2 by google and gets over 5000 hits per month (without wikipedia). What qualifies you to say the site is poor quality? I believe the above has a more respected opinion than you and speaks for itself of not being poor quality. Please do not remove again.

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.199.209.162 (talk) 20:13, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

La Binerie Mont-Royal
Just a note to let you know that I have added three news cites to the article I created on La Binerie Mont-Royal, which is also the setting of a rather well-known Quebec film. Would you consider removing your speedy deletion tag? thank you, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:20, 26 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I just reverted my hasty speedy deletion request.  Teapot  george <sup style="color:blue;">Talk  21:26, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you. And neglected to use the underconstruction tag, as I usually do. So I was a bit hasty myself. Must be a lack of beans. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:43, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

what are you doing?
please don't revert, good, sourced material because you may have a bias. and esp, without leaving an edit reason -- please learn some wiki etiquette —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blahzzz (talk • contribs) 20:45, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

dildo baggins
didn't you see the 'humor' thing? It's meant to be a joke —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gvey! (talk • contribs) 18:32, 1 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia articles are not supposed to be humorous.   — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 18:48, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

User:Marwanlatif
Hi What is User:Marwanlatif a recreation of? Normally this would have been at WP:MfD but no link exists. I will decline the speedy delete until there is some evidence of an AfD. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:07, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Mr and Mrs Schollar
Hi, I noticed that you tagged this page for speedy deletion under criterion A7. While your tagging was not incorrect, I believe you should have used criterion G10 instead, as this is clearly a page created only to attack or disparage its subject. This also gives the creator a more stern warning than a simple notice saying their subject may not be notable. It is also likely to get faster administrator attention.

Keep in mind that attack pages should preferably also be blanked. Some tools, like Twinkle, does this automatically. <span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">decltype (talk) 11:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

You're right thanks for the tip.  Teapot  george <sup style="color:blue;">Talk  11:15, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Declined speedy deletion of Omniology
Hi. I declined your request for deleting of Omniology under WP:CSD as it did not meet the requirements: "Pages consisting purely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history. This does not include poor writing, partisan screeds, obscene remarks, vandalism, fictional material, material not in English, poorly translated material, implausible theories, or hoaxes; some of these, however, may be deleted as vandalism in blatant cases." (My highlighting). The text isn't gibberish (though I think the theory is), and so it does not meet that requirement.

I personally do not think the page should exist, and I would happily support PROD/AFD or the correct CSD criteria. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask. Stephen! Coming... 11:30, 8 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I have PRODed the article. Smartse (talk) 18:24, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Contemporary artists
Drone2Gather (talk) 05:39, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

TeamViewer
Teapotgeorge, what exactly makes you feel the TeamViewer article is looking like an add? TeamViewer is citing its page and also other third party references. Just let me know which section you think requires more cites. Furthermore Comparison_of_remote_desktop_software will give you an overview in which one of the main desktop sharing solutions like TeamViewer with millions of users worldwide shouldn't be missing. What do you think? Altalavista (talk) 06:54, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

IBM Tivoli Application Dependency Discovery Manager
No admin seems to be willing to complete the deletion, so I have sent this speedy nom of yours to AfD as Articles for deletion/IBM Tivoli Application Dependency Discovery Manager. Perhaps there it will find people who can judge. Myself, I too have no opinion. DGG (talk) 02:29, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Hah!
Thank you for slinging it back at me! I think, now that 4 am is a real possibility, that it's time to step away from the keyboard. I hope that we've both had a chortle at my expense. ;-) --Gimme danger (talk) 08:46, 16 June 2009 (UTC) He ehee...it's easily done have a good day!  Teapot  george <sup style="color:blue;">Talk  08:51, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

fyi
Hi - just fyi - this was posted to the user page, rather than their talk page. I have moved it. <span style="padding:2px;background: #cccccc; color: #0000cc; BORDER-RIGHT: #6699cc 3px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #6699cc 3px solid;"> 7   talk   09:15, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Whoops Sorry thanks for moving.  Teapot  george <sup style="color:blue;">Talk  09:16, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * No problemo.  <span style="padding:2px;background: #cccccc; color: #0000cc; BORDER-RIGHT: #6699cc 3px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #6699cc 3px solid;">  7   talk   09:17, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Lorna Bailey
Hi Teapotgeorge. I was puzzled by your removal of the reference to Michael Hogben's book 101 Antiques of the Future on the Lorna Bailey page, especially as there have been requests to add secondary sources to this page. PsycheMan (talk) 16:46, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * You labelled the edit as "Added third party reference" but it was placed in the "further reading" section it was NOT an in-line citation for anything written in the article was it?  Teapot  george <sup style="color:blue;">Talk  17:23, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * No, but it is 'further reading'. Can I re-add it? PsycheMan (talk) 09:22, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It would be more useful to find some or even any secondary sources/references for the article!  Teapot  george <sup style="color:blue;">Talk  09:31, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Susan Singleton
An article that you have been involved in editing, Susan Singleton, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Smartse (talk) 19:44, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Jonathan King
apologies; struck me Little Grape was Purples - see previous Wiki problems - suddenly clear negatives and POV but who gives a shit!Germing (talk) 09:40, 25 June 2009 (UTC) Germing

Are we right to assume the RIAA award is a forgery? Why?Vandalwatcher (talk) 09:10, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * You are talking to the wrong person I am not assuming the RIAA award is a forgery?  Teapot  george <sup style="color:blue;">Talk  09:11, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

"Vandalism"
Hey Teapotgeorge. I edit conflicted with you in reverting the copyvio addition to Tanya Chalkin. and thus noticed your edit summary and the rollback. That was not "vandalism". It was a copyvio, and it is probably a vanity edit given the user's name (and it certainly wasn't NPOV!) but we don't call edits like that "vandalism", and we don't use rollback for them. Continuing to post copyvios after being warned about them, of course, is vandalism, but that wasn't the case here). Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 11:02, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I used rollback and the copyright warning..."The recent edit you made to Tanya Chalkin has been reverted, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder." Not sure why this appears as vandalism in the edit summary? Cheers  Teapot  george <sup style="color:blue;">Talk  11:06, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah. Okay. Rollback is only for vandalism, so when you use rollback, Twinkle, and other programs use a default vandalism edit summary, assuming that the edit is vandalism because that's what rollback is for. If an edit isn't vandalism per se, you shouldn't use rollback. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 11:13, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Sunrise chat
please do not delete my article as I am a student at snrise and I hate sunrise alot, and I need to be able to talk to my friends for free, because my dad won't let me use msn.Shift-2 (talk) 08:49, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Altered Speedy Deletion rationale: BAGH District
Hello Teapotgeorge, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I have deleted a page you tagged (BAGH District) under a different criteria, because the one you provided was inappropriate or incorrect. CSD criteria are narrow and specific, and the process is more effective if the correct deletion rationale is supplied. Consider reviewing the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any queries, please let me know. Thanks again! - Dank (push to talk) 11:45, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Hm, that was an automated notification from the script I'm using, I don't like it very much. Anyway ... when a page has just a link, A3 is better than G11.  Thanks for your tagging work :) - Dank (push to talk) 11:50, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for that as soon as I pressed enter I guessed it was wrong!  Teapot  george <sup style="color:blue;">Talk  21:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion HISHE
George, you deleted or nominated an article of mine for "Promoting". I, however, think you are mistaken for that was far from my intent. Can you tell me what was the "promoting" quoting from my article? (My article was How It Should Have Ended) HISHEfan (talk) 19:57, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * As I said on your talk page...your article "How It Should Have Ended" was deleted by user User:NawlinWiki using the criteria A7: No indication that the article may meet guidelines for inclusion and G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion.  Teapot  george <sup style="color:blue;">Talk  16:40, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Rightttt, sorry about the mix up, I thought it was you who did it. Wikipedia can be very confusing! :-) I'll talk to NawlinWiki. Like I said, Sorry about the mix up —Preceding unsigned comment added by HISHEfan (talk • contribs) 00:01, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Jesus prayers
Thanks for the link; that's not a problem, as the NIV permits small-scale copying, and this is small enough. Nyttend (talk) 12:28, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

BeHealthy1
teapotgeorge, I have been having some real trouble submitting something of real value. Should it be best that I request it be added instead. (Behealthy1 (talk) 18:39, 6 July 2009 (UTC)BeHealthy1)

As far as I recall you have copied and pasted content in violation of copyright...which will always get speedily deleted, as will over promotional stuff (spam) and if you also have a conflict of interest then it won't make it any easier you could try submitting a request for an article here... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requested_articles Good luck  Teapot  george <sup style="color:blue;">Talk  18:55, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

So what I originally created today is gone forever despite my having adjusted and corrected most if not all conflicts of interest per the request that you initially solicited to me?(Behealthy1 (talk) 18:28, 7 July 2009 (UTC))

I apologize for my previous message. I couldn't find the page there for a minute. Okay, I understand to a certain degree with all guidelines required by wikipedia. However, when I read through H-E-B's page for example, I find far more conflicts of interest than when I re-read through my creation. If I continue to keep it 'under construction' will it remain unlisted from search queries and continue to keep it exempt from deletion, for the time being. (Behealthy1 (talk) 20:58, 7 July 2009 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Behealthy1 (talk • contribs) 18:40, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Agrub
dude im new give me a chance Agrub (talk) 13:25, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Hiox
Hello Teapotgeorge, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Hiox - a page you tagged - because: sufficient context exists. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 13:39, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi Julian my apologies... but the article had no content when I tagged it.  Teapot  george <sup style="color:blue;">Talk  13:55, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Clyde vanbarrel
An article that you have been involved in editing, Clyde vanbarrel, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Happy Editing! &mdash;  06:26, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Vacation Resorts International
Your tag on Vacation Resorts International should have been a G-10 (attack page), since beyond the first sentence which seems promotional, the rest is basically an attack piece against the company. --Patar knight - chat/contributions 17:38, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Menno Baars
An article that you have been involved in editing, Menno Baars, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. andy (talk) 07:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Montclair Historical Society
I have "stubified" Montclair Historical Society to avoid its deletion. Bearian (talk) 21:02, 14 July 2009 (UTC)


 * That looks much better... cheers  Teapot  george <sup style="color:blue;">Talk  21:23, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Business Mundi Foundation
First of all, thank you for your significant and important collaboration into this project. I know that we have a misunderstanding, and we are going with the consensus of other users as well, to clear any problem surrounding the crucial issue that you just has pointed out. Now, I have very little time and so, I implore for your understanding and cooperation in regards to answer your comments or questions, other than that I think that I shall be able to demonstrate the relevance of the content and context about the "Busines Mundi Foundation". Please follow the thread in the discussion page. Again thank you and I am looking forward for getting your expertise, assistance and guidance to improve the content of the article on BMundi and please excuse me, for my delay in writing you about it. Greetings. JMK 22:12, 14 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your diligent efforts I rationally think that I needed to I have removed the prod tag from Business Mundi Foundation, which you proposed for deletion.  I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it.  If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the prod template back to the article.  Instead, feel free to list it at Articles for deletion.  Thanks!  the article, I expecting all your cooperation in this matter thank you JMK 23:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC)


 * George, Thank you for your suggestions, I agree with you in that the article should be created in the Spanish version, I should work on that now, but please I would like your guidance to improve the content of our article, therefore tell me if it were alright for me to ask you some questions about it, in the near future. Once more thank you for your time and for your assistance. Sincerely. JMK 14:57, 15 July 2009 (UTC)


 * You misunderstand me ... I believe the article should be deleted and created in Spanish only.  Teapot  george <sup style="color:blue;">Talk  15:26, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

hello
there's loads of things i don't understand in wiki but also loads id but what i need is anyone to answer me that thing i asked help for that i can't find anymore because it was eather deleted or submerged or i just can't find it...

oh and whats the difference between wiki media and pedia ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Timeturn (talk • contribs) 21:49, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Florestan Trio
Just a friendly note on Florestan Trio. I declined the speedy deletion request because winning an award is a good faith claim of importance. If the trio isn't notable (and from the talk page, it looks like they meet WP:MUSIC), try AfD. Cheers!-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  21:43, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Removed speedy deletion tag: David Kvatchantiradze
Hi Teapotgeorge! I just wanted to inform you that I removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on David Kvatchantiradze- because: the article makes a credible claim of importance or significance. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. <span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">decltype (talk) 09:46, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Northamptonshire
Hi ! A WikiProject Northamptonshire has now been created. If you wish  to  help out improving  articles relating  to  anything  in  the county, please don't hesitate to  go  to  the page and sign up! --Kudpung (talk) 14:42, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

HI :)
Hi thanks for all information Henmor (talk) 20:25, 23 August 2009 (UTC) and for kindness! many times i always trying to add this article but every time something hepands ... you ask'ed to add more references and i tried more as i can... please look that article a say what i must change and delete ? and i will do it.! (Arthur Sarkissian (artist) ) ...please help... i really want to do it... Henmor (talk) 20:25, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

about vandalizing ....
Henmor (talk) 05:38, 24 August 2009 (UTC) sorry about vandalizing. but i was just deleting some of Categories: that i was added... what i do wrong of it? Henmor (talk) 05:38, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

I added more references please check
Henmor (talk) 08:00, 25 August 2009 (UTC) I added more references in article Arthur Sarkissian (artist) please check... and if it's enough please delete templates .... if not please help me!!! THX! please answer!

Corrin Campbell page...
Hi,

I was wondering why you have marked this page stated in the Subject as having a COI. Any help/suggestions you can offer so that it can be removed would be helpful.

Chocobofarmer86 (talk) 19:25, 26 August 2009 (UTC)


 * errr... possibly because user CorrinCampbell has been editing? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:CorrinCampbell&action=edit&redlink=1  Teapot  george  <sup style="color:blue;">Talk  23:41, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

I had noticed that upon further investigation into the Edit History, but to say that it was a "major contributor" to the article seems to be an exaggeration. It seems like the birthplace was changed and that was it, i am unsure as to why that was done but i don't believe that that minor alteration warrants a COI warning like that. I am new to wikipedia and that was the 1st article i made so if you can offer up any suggestions how to rectify that problem i would be all ears. Thanks. Chocobofarmer86 (talk) 02:21, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Hey, I suppose an understanding was reached about the COI. Thank you for you watching over my page and helping me in anyway you can. Chocobofarmer86 (talk) 16:18, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Wildworks?
Yo, I have undone without prejudice your wrongful tagging of the Gearslutz article I have been working on for quite sometime now. If you insist in re-tagging it then I will have to ask that you do the same for your article "Wildworks". Gearslutz deserves its own article on the main space and in case you are not aware of, it is a treasure chest in knowledge which only audio engineers can appreciate. Thanks for your cooperation. Regards, Jrod2 (talk) 10:12, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Eric Rhenman
Hello Teapotgeorge, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Eric Rhenman - a page you tagged - because: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 14:46, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Weston Williamson
I've removed your PROD because I had independently redirected the other identical article to this one; and I've changed the "unreferenced" tag to "primarysources", which seems to me a more useful one in these circumstances, because when they see "unref" they add their own website, Myspace etc and think that's enough. I didn't put back my "notability" tag because given all the awards they probably are notable - we'll see what refs Rose can come up with. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:13, 2 September 2009 (UTC)


 * That's fine I wasn't sure how to do a redirect. Cheers  Teapot  george <sup style="color:blue;">Talk  11:25, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Svend Bayer
I've given a source for his Danish parentage. Swedish is wrong: Svend Bayer referred to his Danish ancestry in a talk at "Art in Clay" at Hatfield this year. I know this counts for nothing on Wikipedia, and I'll search for a second published source to give more weight to this fact. Marshall46 (talk) 15:28, 4 September 2009 (UTC)


 * You are quite correct I just double checked in my copy of Studio Pottery by Oliver Watson. Cheers  Teapot  george <sup style="color:blue;">Talk  15:29, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Lorna Bailey
I have removed your PROD tag from this article. Firstly, I found coverage which demonstrates notability, as indicated on the article's talk page. Secondly, since the article has been previously proposed for deletion and was previously kept at AFD (see Articles for deletion/Lorna Bailey), the proposed deletion tag that you placed on the article was not valid anyway.--Michig (talk) 19:21, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Opps so Sorry!
Hi TpG, I am so sorry about the confusion with me adding my name to the Canadian painters section. I am pretty new here and have been having some difficulty navigating and finding appropriate guidelines etc. It was moat assuredely NOT my intention to spam any page, as I am a legitimate professional Canadian artist living in Sweden at the present time. Another member realised my problem after editing me and has graciously helped me to understand much better. I think I get it now. I do want you to know, that I tried very hard to see if it was ok to add my name to the list of artists, and after some serious searching, did not find any guidelines to the contrary (although I am sure there must be some)so, as the option was available on the toolbar and I saw another artist had a picture of his work there, I assumed it was ok. I saw several well known artists there, but also ones I have never heard of and in sort of the same time frame as well. I am totally unsure where the appropriate list is where I fit in at the moment, but I can tell you, I will NOT enter my name even on my own drivers licence before ok'ing it with an editor, or a Guideline Guru. Sorry I gave you a headache.--Jackie ohlsen (talk) 15:37, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

PROD removed from Teresa Quesada
I have removed the prod tag from Teresa Quesada, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the prod template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Articles for deletion. Thanks! Cnilep (talk) 20:12, 7 September 2009 (UTC)


 * OK thanks  Teapot  george <sup style="color:blue;">Talk  20:54, 7 September 2009 (UTC)