User talk:Therobinwilliams

June 2018
Hello, I'm Septrillion. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Kyle Allen, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. \\\Septrillion:- &#8237;  10 Eleventeen 00:36, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jared Nyivh
Hello Therobinwilliams,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jared Nyivh for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Xevus11 (talk) 04:38, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Lavar Ball. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 00:30, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of LostNUnbound


A tag has been placed on LostNUnbound requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. —C.Fred (talk) 20:22, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at LeBron James. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You were disruptive by ignoring the note indicating not to remove him being listed as a guard as well as a forward. Rockchalk 717 00:24, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

September 2018
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to LiAngelo Ball, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 16:39, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Darius Bazley. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Bagumba (talk) 16:45, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at LaMelo Ball. —Bagumba (talk) 02:39, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at LaMelo Ball. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —Bagumba (talk) 08:57, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at LaMelo Ball. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —Bagumba (talk) 09:32, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at LaMelo Ball. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —Bagumba (talk) 01:04, 3 December 2018 (UTC)