User talk:Thescholarlyinsight

__NOINDEX__

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:28, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

unblock review and discussion
Note to future reviewers: There are at least two declined unblock requests in the edit history. Sorry, I'm too tired from writing my review to fish them back out.

In response to the above UTRS ticket, I thought it best to post a further response here.

Please address these concerns in your next unblock request on this page  Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:25, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * In going back through your talk page, I found messages like "You are promoting various non-notable entities and people, including yourself," and in response to your email, this recommendation. " I would suggest we secure a promise to not perform any COI editing as a condition of unblocking and ensure they understand what that means." Please tell us what WP:COI  means in your own words and how that understanding will change your editing.
 * What connections have you with Banned in Boise and Ethan Levy. After Ethan Daniel Levy was deleted, you recreated it and moved it to Ethan Levy. Why?
 * Please explain your relationship to STW Talent Agency.
 * Please read WP:PROMO and relate it you your editing.
 * Please explain WP:notability and how it relates to your editing.
 * All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking. Please relate this to your editing.
 * You must address your understanding of Wikipedia's policy on material copyrighted elsewhere. How will this affect your use of such material?
 * You may only create new articles via WP:AfC. You may not move such pages into article space on your own.
 * You will not edit about any subject with which you have an off-wiki connection.


 * Please address the points above. 331dot (talk) 10:26, 21 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Your previous unblock request gave me the impression that you would edit articles related to your works. If you will avoid writing about yourself, your works, and anything else associated with you, in any Wikipedia article, please say so in your next unblock request. —  Newslinger  talk   06:30, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm coming at this from a different angle, but just as a note we could put in a partial block as part of an unblock condition, adding the problematic pages. This would allow for edit requests about the page but would not otherwise hinder their editing ability. Primefac (talk) 15:28, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, I'm interested in this suggestion, but I don't see any indication that Thescholarlyinsight// would be willing to contribute to topics unrelated to Ethan Levy or STW Talent Agency. Also, Thescholarlyinsight had already been indefinitely blocked by in April 2019, before engaging in block evasion with the  account. I'd also like to hear 's opinion, as they were involved in the UTRS appeal. —  Newslinger   talk   10:02, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Might be a moot point, as I received an email indicating that they were retiring. Primefac (talk) 11:17, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I would be interested in contributing to pages other than the ones listed above, but I rather learn more about Wikipedia, as I do feel like I may have jumped into things a bit too quickly. As I have stated before, Wikipedia is a bit more complex than I anticipated. My main concern now is clearing up some of these public Sockpuppetry notices, as well as any information that reveals identity. Would love your help, and at the very least, only visible for admins. Much appreciated. Thank you again for listening.Thescholarlyinsight (talk) 16:02, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Understood. I do not intend to touch my own page in the future, however, I hope that someone else, not affiliated with the artist will. Additionally, I do have a request to make, and I can utilize your expertise. It seems as though my personal identity, along with the Sockpuppetry article has made its way onto Google, and is searchable by the public. I understand that this needed to be addressed, however, I was wondering if there was anyway for this to be removed so it is no longer made public? It also seems as though my personal IP address is searchable as well. Please advise. Thank you kindly.(Thescholarlyinsight (talk) 13:30, 25 February 2020 (UTC))

Link visible on Google: https://en.wikiredia.com/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Thescholarlyinsight/Archive(Thescholarlyinsight (talk) 13:30, 25 February 2020 (UTC))
 * Hi Thescholarlyinsight, Wikipedia tells search engines not to index certain pages, including all sockpuppet investigations (according to this configuration page). Your link is to a Wikipedia mirror (wikiredia.com). Wikipedia mirrors are independently operated and do not necessarily respect Wikipedia's requests to exclude pages from search engines. Please contact the owner of wikiredia.com if you would like to have that page hidden from search engines. If you have unintentionally revealed your personal IP address on Wikipedia, you may contact the oversight team to request that it be removed from public view. —  Newslinger  talk   10:12, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi Newslinger, thank you for clarifying that. I'm having trouble finding the owner for that site. Any further info/help would be greatly appreciated. Additionally, any possibility of clearing it up on Wikipedia, which in turn, may clear it up on the mirror site. By now, I'm sure you have caught on to the fact that I meant well, and was simply not well versed with this site when performing these edits. Any help would be greatly appreciated. At this point, I just wish to allow my page to organically come to fruition, but would appreciate it if we can clear some these things up on Wikipedia, or at least blank it for admin eyes only. Something of the sort. Thank you again.Thescholarlyinsight (talk) 15:57, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Not sure what I have to contribute to the discussion, all I did was redirect their unblock request here, note previously removed unblock requests, and state standard conditions for unblock-- but I see no reason to unblock, especially as the user has block evaded and socked rather than dealing forthrightly with matters on this account. Wikipedia is the encyclopedia anyone can potentially edit, so I fail to see why editing outside one's COI should be so difficult. If they are not able to do so, then that's that I'm afraid. It looks like they have edited in a COI manner as recently as January, so I see no other reasonable interpretation than that they are not here to build the encyclopedia. I find their protestations quite cynical. It would not be within the realms of reason to consider unblocking before July, when the standard offer would be a hypothetical possibility. Here is a permalink to all the discussions, warnings, etc that have been removed from this page. Just for some context. Again, I see no reason that unblocking this user would be beneficial to Wikipedia.Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:03, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your insight Deepfriedokra. I apologize if my actions have come off in that particularly manner, but in all honest, I was unaware of all the rules and regulations that Wikipedia consisted of, and I was merely trying to contribute factual, notable information. However, it seems as though I should wait for the page Ethan Levy to organically be created. At this point in time, I really would appreciate it if everything received a courtesy blanket only for the parties involved, as I see no reason that my personal identity, as well as online reputation should be tainted in such a manner. Please have good faith and understand my point of view.Thescholarlyinsight (talk) 23:50, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose any further courtesy-blanking. You received many warnings and chose to ignore them but instead to repeatedly post things that violated numerous policies--that record is what it is. Many editors spent time chasing it all down, not all of whom might be savvy enough to know how to search in hidden content, and have already burned us before on requests for reducing your sanctions or hiding the evidence. As has already been explained, it's not on google anyway. Just walk away. DMacks (talk) 05:47, 3 March 2020 (UTC)