User talk:Thesecretnetwork

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Pro Evolution Soccer 6. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites that you are affiliated with, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --Sagaciousuk (talk) 12:40, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Zootit) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. mcr616 Speak! 14:36, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Spam 2
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. AdamJWC 01:04, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Im not to sure if im doing this right and i apologise if its incorrect but the link on jessica-jane clements page going to jessicajaneclement.co.uk is authoised by her and her management and she has been asking us to add it here time and time again, everytime we add it, it keeps getting removed, im not sure why, there was a use posting a link to a similar site called jessica-janeclement.co.uk which we requested to have banned which i believe is now done.

Please bare in mind this is her official site and she wants it on the page.

Thank you

Image:Jme1.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Jme1.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Jme1.jpg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: copy right concerns To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Jme1.jpg, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Jme1.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:19, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

WE OWN THE COPYRIGHT! WHAT IS GOING ON HERE?

=
I think its a bit late for the hang on, as you can see the image has been deleted. It also had a website listed on the front of the image as well and that was my main concern for marking it with speedy deletion. --AdamJWC 13:35, 7 June 2007 (UTC)=====

=
You were actually adding spam links to articles and thats what lead me to the images. If the images are uploaded again they will be deleted again.--AdamJWC 13:37, 7 June 2007 (UTC)=====
 * Before you continue to add weblinks to articles you should take some time out to read this article Spam. If you disagree then you should probably speak to someone like an admin that can explain the situation better than me, see User:Geniac. State your case to him, see what he has to say about it.--AdamJWC 13:46, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

I finally think i know how to use this now.. ;)

I don't understand how the site can make pages about our work, our artists and our cds but not allow us to upload the images that we own the copyright for? you say if we upload them again they will be deleted, but why? we own the images? and its out on our label, its in the interest of the public domain that they are added to our discography.

UKRecordShop.com is not a spam link, its the record label that owns those cds, its the actual name of the label, JME is one of our artists.

A tag has been placed on Eskibeat Recordings, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Videmus Omnia 03:48, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Wileytunnelvision6cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Wileytunnelvision6cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 04:46, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Sahara Knite, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Finngall  talk  20:44, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

(Copying reply from the article's talk page in case it gets deleted)
 * Several points:
 * First of all, you'll notice that someone has questioned Leah Jaye's notability as well. The notability guidelines for biographical articles can be found here and the more specific guidelines for pornographic actors can be found here.
 * Second, comparing one article to another around here can be an exercise in madness. Since anyone can create or edit any article, and since not all articles get the attention they deserve, using the existence or quality of article X to justify the existence of article Y doesn't generally carry much weight.
 * Finally, remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and as such any information therein should be verifiable from reliable sources. There's nothing there to indicate why she's notable enough to merit an entry in an encyclopedia, nor is there even a bare assertion of notability.
 * I hope this helps. -- Finngall  talk  21:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

This has been fixed

Pharoah Williams III
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pharoah Williams III, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Pharoah Williams III. NAHID 17:53, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Pharoah Williams III
I have nominated Pharoah Williams III, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Pharoah Williams III. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. RJC Talk Contribs 17:59, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Talk:Pharoah Williams III has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks.   Compwhiz II ( Talk )( Contribs )  17:59, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Notability
By seeing your comment on Articles for deletion/Pharoah Williams III, I'm forwarding you this page Notability (people). Hope, this would help.--NAHID 18:23, 16 February 2008 (UTC)