User talk:Thesimsmania/Archive 8

Orphaned non-free image File:Corsairfly.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Corsairfly.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:05, 16 April 2012 (UTC)


 * ✅ Delete As that article has been merged after a company merger, the logo is no longer required.  thesimsmania  17:12, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:PixieLottBrentwoodCountyHigh2010.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PixieLottBrentwoodCountyHigh2010.jpg, which you've sourced to http://img243.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=280716940_Image014_122_411lo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:36, 27 April 2012 (UTC)


 * ✅ Done OTRS permissions added to File:PixieLottBrentwoodCountyHigh2010.jpg  thesimsmania  15:58, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Audie Cole
Hello Thesimsmania. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Audie Cole, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: this is not an attack page. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 17:53, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, it was tagged incorrectly on Twinkle  thesimsmania  17:54, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries, but be careful with that button! JohnCD (talk) 18:01, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
Hi Thesimsmania. I'm just letting you know that I've declined your speedy deletion request on Phir Subah Hogi (TV series) because it is not empty. Please only tag pages with the A3 criterion when there is no content on the page whatsoever. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 17:56, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Removing AfD template
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Ramsey Muniz. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t • c »  00:34, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

The College Planning Network
Please slow down a bit with Twinkle - three different speedies within a few minutes is confusing both for the reviewing admin - I had to do a search to be sure this was not a G4 - and, more seriously, for the article author, who gets conflicting messages on his talk page. Remember Twinkle is only a tool - you are responsible for what it does! JohnCD (talk) 20:54, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Face-angel.svg Sorry, getting a bit muddled with it and going a bit over the top with it! Was I right to mark it as a speedy delete?  thesimsmania  21:07, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, it was promotional enough to be a G11, but it wasn't a G4 or a G8. JohnCD (talk) 21:36, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Would you mind checking out this article for me, the user keeps deleting the db-person tag?  thesimsmania  21:38, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I didn't see this at the time. If someone keeps removing speedies, you can give the "uw-speedy" warnings: if they do it again after uw-speedy4, report to WP:AIV. On the other hand, if the article has been improved so that it is no longer speediable, there's no point insisting on putting the tag back, just PROD/AfD/add maintenance templates/help improve it as appropriate. JohnCD (talk) 08:09, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 30
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Woodlands School, Essex (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to English, French, German and ICT

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 30 April 2012 (UTC)


 * ✅ Fixed by myself and User:R'n'B  thesimsmania  22:26, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan J Garvey
Hello Thesimsmania. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan J Garvey, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: no harm in AfD page remaining, and deleting it would cofuse the system. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 22:30, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Mistake The AfD was closed while I was tagging, I didn't see the comment left by User:Gogo Dodo
 * No problem. Tagging AfD pages can cause problems, because the individual AfD pages are transcluded into the daily log, so that, too, appears in the CSD list. One might hope no admin would delete it, but seeing that an admin once deleted the main page you can never be sure! JohnCD (talk) 08:04, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy Deletions?
Why are you nominating Pera College for deletion?Oakley77 (talk) 00:06, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * There is little or no context, however it is notable. I've nominated the article for speedy deletion just to make sure it reaches Wikipedia consensus. That said, the article needs mass expansion, but good job for contributing to Wikipedia!  thesimsmania  00:08, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

So if you think of it almost like a template(?), why are you putting on the delete tag?Oakley77 (talk) 00:11, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Please refer to CSD:A1 and CSD:A7 for more information  thesimsmania  00:16, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

These have importance, but the question is whether you will delete them or not. I think they can and should stay.Oakley77 (talk) 00:18, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I have no control over deletions, that is at the discretion of the administrators  thesimsmania  00:20, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Understood, Thanks though!Oakley77 (talk) 00:48, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thesimsmania, you shouldn't nominate something for deletion if it is a notable topic that just needs expansion. Also, schools are not eligible for deletion under A7, it says so clearly on the template. Further to that, I have removed the speedy deletion template from Brown Rebel, as individual aircraft, boats, and products are not eligible under A7 either. --kelapstick(bainuu) 01:24, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * There is good advice for speedy taggers from an experienced admin at WP:10CSD and WP:A7M - worth reading carefully. It's also worth re-reading WP:CSD regularly to refresh one's mind. JohnCD (talk) 07:53, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I went a bit OTT with the speedy tag, its been noted. Thanks for all your help guys  thesimsmania  17:30, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Argentine Atlantis University
Hello Thesimsmania. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Argentine Atlantis University, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to schools. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:37, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Jeff Sladden wiki page
Hi There

I am Jeff Sladden and I would like this inaccurate piece taken down at once, what do I need to do to have it removed?

Regards

Jeff Sladden — Preceding unsigned comment added by Croctrader (talk • contribs) 16:46, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello there, I marked the article for deletion but this was being discussed by myself and other Wikipedians. You can either (if the page is an attack page) mark the page for deletion using, alternatively you can contact the creator of the article and request he/she place a tag on the page.  thesimsmania  17:01, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Update I've marked the page under as it has been considered like an advert by another user. This means as soon as reviewed by an administrator, the page will be deleted  thesimsmania  17:10, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Update 2 The page has been deleted under  thesimsmania  17:32, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

That AfD you wanted to speedy
None of your speedy-deletion reasons apply here; in particular, it is not a page which disparages its subject and serves no other purpose which is required for G10. There are good reasons why the record of these deletion discussions should be preserved. I have applied the standard privacy-blanking template, which also NOINDEXes the page. I do not myself think that embarrassment to a 15-year-old self-promoter is good enough reason to suppress the whole AfD record - if he learns that what you do on the internet can have real-world consequences, that's a valuable lesson. Any attempt to delete it by a deletion discussion or by request at WP:BLP/N is only likely to provide more exposure. If you are in email contact with the subject and he is still not happy, point him to WP:FEFS which tells him how to contact OTRS. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 18:20, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * PS - looking at the item above this, though that one has ended happily, we have to be rather careful with people claiming to be subject of articles, as there is no way, based on WP messages, to be sure they are who they say. WP:BLP/H has advice to point them to, and the WP:OTRS team can deal with authentication of identity by email, starting with the WP:FEFS link I gave above. JohnCD (talk) 19:02, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm trying really hard for this guy, and I've forwarded that information on. Thanks  thesimsmania  19:25, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I just did a Google search on his name and none of the first 50 entries are him, or at least none of them are him on WP, so he is quite well buried. JohnCD (talk) 20:11, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:ArcadiaGroup.svg)
Thanks for uploading File:ArcadiaGroup.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:21, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Page Curation newsletter
Hey. I'm dropping you a note because you used to (or still do!) patrol new pages. This is just to let you know that we've deployed and developed Page Curation, which augments and supersedes Special:NewPages - there are a lot of interesting new features :). There's some help documentation here if you want to familiarise yourself with the system and start using it. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 12:58, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi and thanks - the new features seem awesome. Good job :)  thesimsmania  21:57, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

People like us (harpurhey)
I don't think it's helpful to add the "Needs sections" tag to a one-paragraph stub like this. On the other hand it would have been really helpful to remove the leading space which was making the article unreadable. And it needed unreferenced, one of the most important of tags. And dead end because it had no wikilinks (but it does have now). It only took a few minutes to clean up the article, add several useful links, etc. If you're going to do "Page Curation", please take a little more care to add relevant tags and perhaps fix up the article where it has such obvious needs. Thanks. Pam D  21:16, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

David Oppenheim
Please do something useful with your time. Tagging articles within 5 minutes of creation is really not helpful.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  12:17, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The article was not marked as patrolled - I therefore marked it and added a cleanup tag because it wholly based on one source. I could clearly see that you were not a new user and that the biography was notable. Being usually on a anti-vandal/CSD patrol I may have overreacted, apologies  thesimsmania  12:20, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Not marked as patrolled? I'm on autopatrol and have been since about 2008.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  12:23, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Just going by what's on my screen at the time of tagging on Special:NewPages it was shown as unpatrolled, check your autopatrol to make sure its working correctly  thesimsmania  12:26, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Whoops feel like a right idiot now, didn't patrol your page it was the one above it - ignore all my rants and tags *slaps Twinkle for being so fast*  thesimsmania  12:31, 16 February 2013 (UTC)


 * That's alright, no harm intended. Be careful, that Twinkle can be a bit of a loose cannon!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  12:35, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

IndieGameReviewer.com
thanks for your feedback on the image in infobox for indiegamereviewer.com

As I had to create a new account my login does not have sufficient age to upload the fair-use image which is here http://www.indiegamereviewer.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/IGR-logo-2.png

perhaps you can help me in getting it into the infobox?

ArchKali (talk) 12:57, 16 February 2013 (UTC) (talk • contribs) 12:46, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi there, sure I'd be happy to help. I'll add this in for you. Remember to sign your posts using the 4 tildes too.  thesimsmania  12:50, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

thank you kindly :)

ArchKali (talk) 12:58, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello,

The page IndieGameReviewer.com was speedy deleted and I feel it is unwarranted. I was developing it to a satisfactory state late last night and wanted to fill in the blanks today. Are you able to lend some support to reversing its deletion? I would appreciate it. The site is not a mere marketing site, but actually does provide some very valuable talks with important independent game developers (that were listed in my writeup) that I feel are of great interest to young aspiring game designers. I think that whomever deleted it acted too hastily and the decision is unwarranted.

I appreciate any support you may lend in this matter.

ArchKali (talk) 01:30, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I only reviewed the page initially, it was up to the decision of another curator and finally the administrator that deleted the page. There is nothing I can do personally. I see that the page has now been userfied. What I would do is keep it there and work on it further.  thesimsmania  16:41, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind words on my article on Vamona Navelcar dated 16 February. May I know where you saw this article as the original article was rejected by Wikipedia for lack of verification. However, now there is a page under Vamona Navelcar to which I have contributed and hope to ad my article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anniemation001 (talk • contribs) 00:58, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Please also view my new page on Facebook under the name of Vamona Ananta Sinai Navelcar at this link. http://www.facebook.com/VamonaNavelcar?ref=ts&fref=ts Best regards. Anniemation001 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anniemation001 (talk • contribs) 01:05, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for the barnstar !!! Cialo (talk) 16:27, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Boervolk Radio
I deleted and then restored it. Deleting felt wrong all the while I was pushing the buttons. Google turns up mentions that make me suspectt the subject is notable. Hopefully they can find the sourcing and the notability for the article to survive. Thanks. Dloh cierekim  21:32, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * No worries, you've done what you thought was best  thesimsmania  22:12, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Another Day Another Life
Hi there, Thanks for reviewing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Another_Day_Another_Life_(short_film). Information is updated based on your guidelines and resubmitted. Thanks for your help Bbry2 22:42, 20 February 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lcarg2012 (talk • contribs)
 * ✅ Accepted I've read through and it's much better, well done and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!  thesimsmania  22:45, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much. On a different note: images for this article was deleted by someone quoting as we were not the owner of that material. I have sent an email to help team but haven't heard back from them. Would you be able to help? Bbry2 22:49, 20 February 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lcarg2012 (talk • contribs)
 * If you do own them and can provide evidence, than submit a request using WP:OTRS. On an unrelated note, I notice you sign comments as Bbry2 yet your username is Lcarg2012. If you want information on changing your username than see WP:RENAME.  thesimsmania  23:36, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Great thanks will check out WP:OTRS. I was also surprised at the signature, but thanks to catching that. Will look in to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lcarg2012 (talk • contribs) 01:34, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi Thesimsmania, please review this updated entry for IndieGameReviewer.com and let me know if you can offer any further insight on how to improve it in advance of attempting to submit it for publication. You time is appreciated. Thanks in advance.

ArchKali (talk) 12:59, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Articles for creation/Becket Keys School.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! RadioFan (talk) 00:26, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Teahouse Invitation
Tariqmudallal (talk) 15:40, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

File:BigTenConferenceLogo2011.svg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BigTenConferenceLogo2011.svg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 17:05, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:BrentwoodCountyHighVIForm.png


A tag has been placed on File:BrentwoodCountyHighVIForm.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  thesimsmania  18:50, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:BrentwoodCountyHighSixthForm.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:BrentwoodCountyHighSixthForm.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  thesimsmania  18:50, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WoodlandsSchoolEssexLogo.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:WoodlandsSchoolEssexLogo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:42, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews
Hello. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular. The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered. If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.) If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with. Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors. I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC). Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Arkefly.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Arkefly.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TUIfly.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:TUIfly.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jetairfly.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Jetairfly.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TUIfly-Nordic.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:TUIfly-Nordic.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:07, 1 March 2017 (UTC)