User talk:Thestrangeruknew

Proposed deletion of Fatal Urge Carefree Kiss
Hello, Thestrangeruknew. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Fatal Urge Carefree Kiss, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Fatal Urge Carefree Kiss to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Robertgombos (talk) 08:20, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gagan Rai


A tag has been placed on Gagan Rai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 08:28, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of God of a man
Hello Thestrangeruknew,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged God of a man for deletion because the article appears to be about something that you or someone you know personally invented, coined, or discovered, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important—that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Roxy the dog. bark 09:45, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mishiida Alexander
Hello Thestrangeruknew,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mishiida Alexander for deletion because the article appears to be about something that you or someone you know personally invented, coined, or discovered, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important—that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Roxy the dog. bark 09:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Hello, I'm DrStrauss. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Mishiida Alexander— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Dr Strauss   talk   08:30, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about God of a man
Hello, Thestrangeruknew,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether God of a man should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/God of a man.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Roxy the dog. bark 08:39, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gagan Rai


The article Gagan Rai has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Roxy the dog. bark 08:44, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of God of a Man
Hello Thestrangeruknew,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged God of a Man for deletion because the article appears to be about something that you or someone you know personally invented, coined, or discovered, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important—that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Roxy the dog. bark 08:57, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Good to know
Facebook pages, instagram profiles and any othe social network are cot even considered resources when you have argument something. Imagine this: Somebo ask you where is located the strernocleidomastoidin muscle. or what is a xenograph or a how many paintings van Gogh has painted. If you were to write something official, journalisc... you have to find reliable sources like newspapers, magazines and most importantly books. So, if a book and a newspaper article say that the sternocleidomastoidian is in the area of our neck most certainly that the information is true.

Now, this is how you shoul think about citing your articles. Search on google books, Google News, search pdf file: *.pdf "your article title gere". If you do it right and know. Just give it a try an PM if you need help. Robert G. (talk) 10:41, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gagan Rai


A tag has been placed on Gagan Rai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 18:45, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Your(?) comment on my Talk page
I think you may have been logged out when you left a comment on my Talk page. I've moved it to the bottom of the page and responded, and I think any further responses should go there rather than elsewhere. If the IP was actually someone entirely different, then my apologies. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 02:25, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Fatal Urge Carefree Kiss for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fatal Urge Carefree Kiss is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fatal Urge Carefree Kiss until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PRehse (talk) 11:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)