User talk:Thetimeisnow2

Speedy deletion of Ross Seyfried
A tag has been placed on Ross Seyfried requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. CultureDrone (talk) 21:26, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Ross Seyfried
A tag has been placed on Ross Seyfried, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thetimeisnow2 (talk) 21:32, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Ross Seyfried
Hi. I don't know what you used to add the hangon tag to this article, but it was malformed and, well, not Wikipedia style (according to the instructions) :-) The article itself just needs a tag added, and the reason needs to be on the talk page. I've fixed this for you. CultureDrone (talk) 21:46, 6 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi. As far as I can see, that particular article has actually been deleted. You should also be aware that talk pages aren't generally allowed without the corresponding article - mainly as it wouldn't make sense to have a page talking about something that didn't exist, so that will probably be deleted as well. Anyway, the problem (as I see it) with your original article, and the reason I proposed it for deletion, was that it didn't actually tell me anything. When I looked at the page, all I saw was a few headings, and links to various web sites - there was nothing to even tell me who or what the article was actually supposed to be about. I could guess from the name that it was probably a person (though it could be a company), but there was no indication of why they were notable enough to be included in Wikipedia, or even if they were currently alive or dead ! If you think the article is worth rewriting, then I suggest you firstly have a look at other biographical articles - just think of someone famous and have a look at their article and how it's constructed, and then read this: Your first article. If you need any help, you're welcome to ask me - just be aware that since I'm in the UK, there may be a time difference and I'm not online 100% of the time! Happy editing :-) CultureDrone (talk) 09:23, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Incidentally, I'm not sure what you mean on the Ross Seyfried talk page by "It should not be a dead link on so many wikipedia pages" - as far as I can tell, it's only linked to by one actual article and two talk pages - hardly 'many' :-) CultureDrone (talk) 09:27, 7 September 2008 (UTC)