User talk:Thetruth210

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jah. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 18:26, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

The jah page
I wasn't trying to commit vandalism nor did I create my account to destroy religion topics but I was correcting the page because it holds what I believe is false information. I intend to do no harm if you simply allow me to correct the page that I have some connection to. {


 * If, after you "correct" something, other editors revert you, you need to go to the article's talk page (here, that's Talk:Jah) and discuss the issue. You can't simply keep trying to force your opinion about what is or isn't correct.  Thanks.  Qwyrxian (talk) 11:44, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


 * The edits were deliberate vandalism. There is no belief among any group that the Tetragrammaton is rendered in the way this editor changed it to. In fact, I'm almost sure he was trying to replace the proper rendering with his own name. --IronMaidenRocks (talk) 03:11, 4 August 2011 (UTC)