User talk:Thetruthseeker82

December 2018
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinu t/c 00:26, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

What concerns do you have about this? 331dot (talk) 09:28, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment TBAN seems reasonable if this is just a misadventure. Even though the user name thing intrigues me. Would go on to remind user that gone are the days when we edited based on personal knowledge. Much more stodgy.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 14:39, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree with Dlohcierekim. Looking through all this, I would not be averse to an unblock, given the self-imposed topic ban that the user suggests in the unblock request below. As long as future editing adheres to WP:5P (and, given the username, WP:TRUTH), I currently see no other issues. -- Kinu t/c 16:37, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I did not realize that I was suppose to make comments up here and not make another unblock request to share my thoughts. So I apologize to Yamla. Again thank you for blocking me so that I can learn how to do this right. I will read through WP:5P and WP:TRUTH before posting anything else and making sure that I am compliant to regain your trust. Again thank you for the wake up call! I am ready to move forward.Thetruthseeker82

You have three unblock requests. You can only have one at a time. --Yamla (talk) 15:10, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment I was not aware I had only one submission. I was just responding to previous communications. I thought that was how I was suppose to communicate this was by posting it through the unblock tags, that was totally my fault. I will work to follow all the rules. Thank you for your consideration. I really mean nothing by these mistakes and will get this right. I am going to read heavily and do it right when I have access again. I will read through WP:5P and WP:TRUTH before posting anything else and making sure that I am compliant and ready to go and hope to regain your trust. Again thank you for the wake up call!  --Thetruthseeker82 (talk)

globally renamed Latterdayseo to Thetruthseeker82
globally renamed Latterdayseo to Thetruthseeker82 -- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 04:57, 7 December 2018 (UTC)