User talk:Thevetran

Specifications are helpful to those that need to reference performance data and to end users. There isn't much there to bloat so I find it odd that you would undo this data being added.

Kyrie Irving
Where did you find this source? It doesn't work. For me, it comes up with "Oops, 404 Error!", and no internet archive sites have it saved. You are going to need a source that actually works to prove your point. DaHuzyBru (talk) 07:50, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * But, I'm not going to revert again. A quick google search of "kyrie irving dual citizen" has brought up many more that actually work . DaHuzyBru (talk) 07:54, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia is all about consensus. Read this discussion again – it is 3 to 1 in favour of Australian not being in the lead/infobox. You are in the minority, please don't start another edit war. Forcing your opinion over consensus is not productive and can lead to a block. DaHuzyBru (talk) 09:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Kyrie Irving. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a blockage. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 03:23, 8 January 2017 (UTC)