User talk:Theworks84

Welcome!
Hi Theworks84! I noticed your contributions to Ai-Khanoum&#32;and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Danre98 ( talk ^ contribs ) 17:48, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Theworks84. Thank you. Antiquistik (talk) 17:11, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
Doug Weller talk 19:56, 8 February 2023 (UTC)


 * I have absolutely no idea what you are referring to. I haven't made any edits to the pages of these countries. Theworks84 (talk) 21:39, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Do you really think that the American Council on Science and Health mix a reliable source?
Meeting WP:RS? Doug Weller talk 19:58, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

They have produced a great number of publications on a variety of topics over many years and are indeed credible. We should not confuse credibility with bias. Much like DeSmog they are a credible organisation albeit with a bias. The edit in question relates to unfounded accusations that DeSmog has previously made. Regardless of whether you or I believe them it is only balanced to mention the other sides perspective particularly as DeSmog offered no evidence for their accusations. Theworks84 (talk) 21:28, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Scythians into Scythia. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 17:38, 3 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi. Thank you for advising me of this. Just to clarify though, the sections which I copied were actually from an earlier version of the Scythia page and were not copied from the Scythians page. I assume that these same paragraphs must have been copied onto the Scythians page during the recent re-structure of the Scythia page that happened that several months ago. Given I was partially re-storing an earlier version of the Scythia page and not copying from the Scythians page would there still be a need to retroactively provide attribution? Thanks.   Theworks84 (talk) 13:01, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I see some of your edit summaries show that you were restoring content, but this particular edit did not. It would be better if each edit had an edit summary indicating where you got the content, and easier for patrollers such as myself to understand what's going on. — Diannaa (talk) 14:09, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Hello, I'm GenoV84. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Greco-Buddhism in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Remember: Wikipedia is not censored. GenoV84 (talk) 19:30, 21 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Response to GenoV84 User talk:GenoV84 Theworks84 (talk) 18:03, 26 December 2023 (UTC)