User talk:TheyCallMeHeartbreaker

August 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Almost Famous, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. MikeWazowski (talk) 18:49, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Gunit31, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Gurt Posh (talk) 09:59, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Gunit31/Foreign language testing


A tag has been placed on User:Gunit31/Foreign language testing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gurt Posh (talk) 14:30, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Foreign language testing


A tag has been placed on Foreign language testing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gurt Posh (talk) 06:14, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vertical thinking vs. Lateral thinking


The article Vertical thinking vs. Lateral thinking has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Personal essay, almost completely unsourced and much original research with heavy use of WP:Synthesis per WP:No original research. What's left when you remove the essay and reflection is already covered in lateral thinking.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gurt Posh (talk) 12:41, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Vertical thinking vs. Lateral thinking for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vertical thinking vs. Lateral thinking is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Vertical thinking vs. Lateral thinking until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gurt Posh (talk) 16:23, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Welcome
Hey welcome to the Wikipedia India Education Program as a Campus Ambassador. I hope it will be a big addition to the CA Community. Hope to see you soon and looking forward to working with you.

Wå§ïm Mðgål 09:03, 1 September 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wasimmogal2007 (talk • contribs)

Hi Gunit!
Welcome to Wikipedia! I'll surly meet you in the training :)

Cheers,

Ram (talk • contribs) 16:14, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Thank You
Thanks a lot, i think i like it this way! :P

Tahera (11:38, 11 September 2011 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tb0412 (talk • contribs)

Proposed deletion of Grey Box Testing


The article Grey Box Testing has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Short article. All of the material is listed at Software testing. Inconsistent spelling.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:41, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Grey Box Testing


A tag has been placed on Grey Box Testing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:49, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

India Education Program
Hi there! Please visit Wikipedia talk:India Education Program and see if there is anything you  can do  to  address the issues that  are being  discussed there. Many thanks, and happy  editing! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:50, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Software crisis
Please see Talk:Software crisis concerning the section I removed from the article as a copyright violation. There are some guidelines there that you really need to take on board. Best wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 13:46, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Electric steam boiler and copyright
Please be careful when encouraging students to add to the contents of articles, especially when it's phrased quite so bluntly as, "Your article seems to be really short and incomplete."

This article was until recently a lot longer, and it had images. These were removed (quite rightly!) by other non-IEP editors because the content was rife with copyright violations. These are not acceptable on Wikipedia. They are still not acceptable even when they're student coursework for IEP. I would hope that you're familiar with the recent disruptions caused to WP by IEP over this sort of issue, and with this course in particular.

It would be good to have a longer and more detailed article. However this cannot be done by ignoring copyright, no matter what the course's previous attitude to copyright might have been. It's important that students understand this and CAs have an important role in explaining this to them. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:41, 14 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Apologies for my mistake. I acknowledge where I went wrong. I will definitely be careful in future.Gunit31 (talk) 14:15, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
 Ol Yeller21 Talktome 15:32, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:46, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Variator (variable valve timing)
The three things that are labelled are
 * 1) Incoming links - there are actually several, but it would be worth checking if some of those to Variator should in fact be to this article.
 * 2) Citations - specifically those items labelled "Citation needed".
 * 3) Clean up - I'm not sure specifically what needs cleaning.

The other matter of note is the lack of any coverage of the "Other variator-based VVT systems".

Rich Farmbrough, 17:56, 25 October 2011 (UTC).


 * Thank You. I am not a subject matter expert. So i guess all I can do is just add inline citations. I'l try to work with incoming links.Gunit31 (talk) 07:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi!

I noticed that you had posted the following on a talk page I watch:

"I really want to help improve the article but I cannot figure out how I can do so. The talk page of the article is blank and hence there is no other place where I could leave a message for help."

If an article has a blank talk page, you are free to create one. Just click the "New Section" link at the top. The article talk page is the correct place to discuss improving the article, so go ahead and post your ideas about improving the article there.

BTW, if you need help, there is no need to go looking for a userpage to post your help request on. All you have to do is to type on your own talk page, and someone will show up to answer your questions. Guy Macon (talk) 18:57, 25 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank You. Will definitely use the talk page next time.Gunit31 (talk) 07:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Message
thanks for editing production drawing....keep editing — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhushanmohite92 (talk • contribs) 12:14, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Your welcome, and you should use headings wen you write messages on some one's talk pages. ;-)

hello
thnx dear....guide me properly...... 49.203.171.49 (talk) 13:17, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Whoever this is (I am guessing one of my friends of course), I suppose you forgot to log in when you sent this message. Hence I cannot see your username, but only your IP address. Nevertheless, I will definately guide you.Gunit31 (talk) 13:54, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

hello
hoping dat,u hav recieved my msg Correctly,coz i blindly started writing msg on ur talk page..hehe


 * Yes but you forgot 2 put ur signature.. (4 tildes, remember??)..;) keep editing TheyCallMeHeartbreaker (talk) 17:21, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

mwahahahhahahhahaha!

A kitten for you!
Hi Gunit, great to see you at WikiProject India. Hope you find companionship, learning, exciting interactions and purpose over here!

AshLin (talk) 04:41, 29 February 2012 (UTC) 