User talk:Thezac0515

June 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jane (given name). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 17:34, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Andy (given name). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 17:36, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Jane (given name). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Slon02 (talk) 19:05, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Andy Kendy
A tag has been placed on Andy Kendy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Moocha (talk) 19:07, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Jane (given name), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. KoshVorlon Naluboutes,Aeria Gloris 19:18, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Jane (given name), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Moocha (talk) 19:19, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Daywalkers


The article Daywalkers has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable term

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Bramble  claw  x   00:11, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Daywalkers
I have nominated Daywalkers, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Daywalkers. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  Bramble  claw  x   23:14, 4 June 2010 (UTC)